261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23696155)
1. Framing the willingness-to-pay question: impact on response patterns and mean willingness to pay.
Gyrd-Hansen D; Jensen ML; Kjaer T
Health Econ; 2014 May; 23(5):550-63. PubMed ID: 23696155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Willingness to pay for publicly financed health care services in Central and Eastern Europe: evidence from six countries based on a contingent valuation method.
Tambor M; Pavlova M; Rechel B; Golinowska S; Sowada C; Groot W
Soc Sci Med; 2014 Sep; 116():193-201. PubMed ID: 25016327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of the design of payment scales on the willingness to pay for health gains.
Soeteman L; van Exel J; Bobinac A
Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Jul; 18(6):743-760. PubMed ID: 27623946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The random card sort method and respondent certainty in contingent valuation: an exploratory investigation of range bias.
Shackley P; Dixon S
Health Econ; 2014 Oct; 23(10):1213-23. PubMed ID: 23922327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Willingness to pay and the sensitivity of willingness to pay for interdisciplinary musculoskeletal clinics: a contingent valuation study in Quebec, Canada.
Poder TG; He J
Int J Health Econ Manag; 2016 Dec; 16(4):337-361. PubMed ID: 27878690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Willingness to pay for a hearing aid: comparing the payment scale and open-ended question.
Grutters JP; Anteunis LJ; Chenault MN; Joore MA
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Feb; 15(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 19239587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stated and actual altruistic willingness to pay for insecticide-treated nets in Nigeria: validity of open-ended and binary with follow-up questions.
Onwujekwe O; Uzochukwu B
Health Econ; 2004 May; 13(5):477-92. PubMed ID: 15127427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Willingness to pay for voluntary community-based health insurance: findings from an exploratory study in the state of Penang, Malaysia.
Shafie AA; Hassali MA
Soc Sci Med; 2013 Nov; 96():272-6. PubMed ID: 23528670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can a Circular Payment Card Format Effectively Elicit Preferences? Evidence From a Survey on a Mandatory Health Insurance Scheme in Tunisia.
Chanel O; Makhloufi K; Abu-Zaineh M
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2017 Jun; 15(3):385-398. PubMed ID: 27798795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Individual responsibility and health-risk behaviour: a contingent valuation study from the ex ante societal perspective.
van der Star SM; van den Berg B
Health Policy; 2011 Aug; 101(3):300-11. PubMed ID: 21168930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of two methods for eliciting contingent valuations of colorectal cancer screening.
Whynes DK; Frew E; Wolstenholme JL
J Health Econ; 2003 Jul; 22(4):555-74. PubMed ID: 12842315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Eliciting willingness to pay: comparing closed-ended with open-ended and payment scale formats.
Frew EJ; Whynes DK; Wolstenholme JL
Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 12693877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility and construct validity of the parent willingness-to-pay technique for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Barron AC; Lee TL; Taylor J; Moore T; Passo MH; Graham TB; Griffin TA; Grom AA; Lovell DJ; Brunner HI
Arthritis Rheum; 2004 Dec; 51(6):899-908. PubMed ID: 15593249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life-year: the individual perspective.
Bobinac A; Van Exel NJ; Rutten FF; Brouwer WB
Value Health; 2010 Dec; 13(8):1046-55. PubMed ID: 20825620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing willingness-to-pay: bidding game format versus open-ended and payment scale formats.
Frew EJ; Wolstenholme JL; Whynes DK
Health Policy; 2004 Jun; 68(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 15113640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Acceptance and understandability of various methods of health valuations for the chronically ill: willingness to pay, visual analogue scale and rating scale].
Meder M; Farin E
Gesundheitswesen; 2009 Nov; 71(11):e62-71. PubMed ID: 20094981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Willingness to pay for a reduction in mortality risk after a myocardial infarction: an application of the contingent valuation method to the case of eplerenone.
Pinto-Prades JL; Farreras V; de Bobadilla JF
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Feb; 9(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 17447095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influences of the absence of random assignment of bids on estimating willingness to pay using a discrete-choice question.
Takemura S; Ohida T; Sone T; Fukuda T; Takemura Y
Health Econ; 2005 Feb; 14(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 15386653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of 'reference goods' in contingent valuation: should we help respondents to 'construct' their willingness to pay?
Smith RD
Health Econ; 2007 Dec; 16(12):1319-32. PubMed ID: 17328037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. User Fees in General Practice: Willingness to Pay and Potential Substitution Patterns-Results from a Danish GP Patient Survey.
Kronborg C; Pedersen LB; Fournaise A; Kronborg CN
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2017 Oct; 15(5):615-624. PubMed ID: 28364368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
