These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

785 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23696212)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: an in vitro study.
    Goldsmith MT; Jansson KS; Smith SD; Engebretsen L; LaPrade RF; Wijdicks CA
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 Jul; 41(7):1595-604. PubMed ID: 23696212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 2 femoral tunnel locations in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study.
    Driscoll MD; Isabell GP; Conditt MA; Ismaily SK; Jupiter DC; Noble PC; Lowe WR
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Oct; 28(10):1481-9. PubMed ID: 22796141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Knee Kinematics After Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction via the Medial Portal Technique With a Central Femoral Tunnel and an Eccentric Femoral Tunnel and After Anatomic Double-Bundle Reconstruction: A Human Cadaveric Study.
    Herbort M; Domnick C; Raschke MJ; Lenschow S; Förster T; Petersen W; Zantop T
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Jan; 44(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 26574601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of graft structures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Lord BR; El-Daou H; Sabnis BM; Gupte CM; Wilson AM; Amis AA
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Feb; 25(2):559-568. PubMed ID: 27637854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic double-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and nonanatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.
    Kondo E; Merican AM; Yasuda K; Amis AA
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Feb; 39(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 21239692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An In Vitro Robotic Assessment of the Anterolateral Ligament, Part 2: Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Combined With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Nitri M; Rasmussen MT; Williams BT; Moulton SG; Cruz RS; Dornan GJ; Goldsmith MT; LaPrade RF
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Mar; 44(3):593-601. PubMed ID: 26831632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative kinematic evaluation of all-inside single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study.
    Tsai AG; Wijdicks CA; Walsh MP; Laprade RF
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Feb; 38(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 19966094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of knee joint laxities and graft forces after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by anteromedial portal, outside-in, and transtibial techniques.
    Sim JA; Gadikota HR; Li JS; Li G; Gill TJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Dec; 39(12):2604-10. PubMed ID: 21908717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in the length of virtual anterior cruciate ligament fibers during stability testing: a comparison of conventional single-bundle reconstruction and native anterior cruciate ligament.
    Brophy RH; Voos JE; Shannon FJ; Granchi CC; Wickiewicz TL; Warren RF; Pearle AD
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):2196-203. PubMed ID: 18669985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo kinematic evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Kopf S; Musahl V; Bignozzi S; Irrgang JJ; Zaffagnini S; Fu FH
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Sep; 42(9):2172-7. PubMed ID: 24961443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of graft fixation angles on anteroposterior and rotational knee laxity in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation using computerized navigation.
    Koga H; Muneta T; Yagishita K; Ju YJ; Sekiya I
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 Mar; 40(3):615-23. PubMed ID: 22109546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Biomechanical Comparison of Single-, Double-, and Triple-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Using a Hamstring Tendon Graft.
    Suzuki T; Shino K; Yamakawa S; Otsubo H; Suzuki D; Matsumura T; Fujimiya M; Fujie H; Yamashita T
    Arthroscopy; 2019 Mar; 35(3):896-905. PubMed ID: 30733036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical evaluation of anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques using the quadriceps tendon.
    Kim D; Asai S; Moon CW; Hwang SC; Lee S; Keklikci K; Linde-Rosen M; Smolinski P; Fu FH
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Mar; 23(3):687-95. PubMed ID: 25448139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anterolateral Knee Extra-articular Stabilizers: A Robotic Sectioning Study of the Anterolateral Ligament and Distal Iliotibial Band Kaplan Fibers.
    Geeslin AG; Chahla J; Moatshe G; Muckenhirn KJ; Kruckeberg BM; Brady AW; Coggins A; Dornan GJ; Getgood AM; Godin JA; LaPrade RF
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 May; 46(6):1352-1361. PubMed ID: 29558208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anatomic and nonanatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo kinematic analysis.
    Zaffagnini S; Marcheggiani Muccioli GM; Signorelli C; Lopomo N; Grassi A; Bonanzinga T; Nitri M; Marcacci M
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Mar; 42(3):708-15. PubMed ID: 24519185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of in situ forces and knee kinematics in anteromedial and high anteromedial bundle augmentation for partially ruptured anterior cruciate ligament.
    Xu Y; Liu J; Kramer S; Martins C; Kato Y; Linde-Rosen M; Smolinski P; Fu FH
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Feb; 39(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 21131679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anatomical and nonanatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: importance of femoral tunnel location on knee kinematics.
    Zantop T; Diermann N; Schumacher T; Schanz S; Fu FH; Petersen W
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Apr; 36(4):678-85. PubMed ID: 18296542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction outperforms any types of single bundle ACL reconstructions in controlling dynamic rotational laxity.
    Maeyama A; Hoshino Y; Kato Y; Debandi A; Lertwanich P; Wang JH; Smolinski P; Fu FH
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1414-1419. PubMed ID: 29138915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An In Vitro Robotic Assessment of the Anterolateral Ligament, Part 1: Secondary Role of the Anterolateral Ligament in the Setting of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.
    Rasmussen MT; Nitri M; Williams BT; Moulton SG; Cruz RS; Dornan GJ; Goldsmith MT; LaPrade RF
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Mar; 44(3):585-92. PubMed ID: 26684663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The effect of central anatomical single-bundle versus anatomical double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament on knee stability. a clinical study].
    Komzák M; Hart R; Smíd P; Puskeiler M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 25137498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.