BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23697373)

  • 1. The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Mowatt G; Scotland G; Boachie C; Cruickshank M; Ford JA; Fraser C; Kurban L; Lam TB; Padhani AR; Royle J; Scheenen TW; Tassie E
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 May; 17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. PubMed ID: 23697373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.
    Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M
    Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic review and modelling of the cost-effectiveness of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging compared with current existing testing pathways in ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
    Campbell F; Thokala P; Uttley LC; Sutton A; Sutton AJ; Al-Mohammad A; Thomas SM
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Sep; 18(59):1-120. PubMed ID: 25265259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the First-line Tool for Men with High Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
    Panebianco V; Valerio MC; Giuliani A; Pecoraro M; Ceravolo I; Barchetti G; Catalano C; Padhani AR
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):208-214. PubMed ID: 31102623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schoots IG; Roobol MJ; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW; Hunink MG
    Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):438-50. PubMed ID: 25480312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of MRI-based technologies for patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Bresnahan R; Duarte R; Mahon J; Beale S; Chaplin M; Bhattacharyya D; Houten R; Edwards K; Nevitt S; Maden M; Boland A
    Health Technol Assess; 2023 Jul; 27(10):1-115. PubMed ID: 37839810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective.
    de Rooij M; Crienen S; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Rovers MM; Grutters JP
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 24377803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate with three functional techniques in patients with PSA elevation before initial TRUS-guided biopsy.
    Hauth E; Hohmuth H; Cozub-Poetica C; Bernand S; Beer M; Jaeger H
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150422. PubMed ID: 26268144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer.
    Drost FH; Osses DF; Nieboer D; Steyerberg EW; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ; Schoots IG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Apr; 4(4):CD012663. PubMed ID: 31022301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ablative therapy for people with localised prostate cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Ramsay CR; Adewuyi TE; Gray J; Hislop J; Shirley MD; Jayakody S; MacLennan G; Fraser C; MacLennan S; Brazzelli M; N'Dow J; Pickard R; Robertson C; Rothnie K; Rushton SP; Vale L; Lam TB
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jul; 19(49):1-490. PubMed ID: 26140518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positron emission tomography/computerised tomography imaging in detecting and managing recurrent cervical cancer: systematic review of evidence, elicitation of subjective probabilities and economic modelling.
    Meads C; Auguste P; Davenport C; Małysiak S; Sundar S; Kowalska M; Zapalska A; Guest P; Thangaratinam S; Martin-Hirsch P; Borowiack E; Barton P; Roberts T; Khan K
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Mar; 17(12):1-323. PubMed ID: 23537558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PROGENSA® prostate cancer antigen 3 assay and the Prostate Health Index in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Nicholson A; Mahon J; Boland A; Beale S; Dwan K; Fleeman N; Hockenhull J; Dundar Y
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Oct; 19(87):i-xxxi, 1-191. PubMed ID: 26507078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimising the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in the Era of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis Based on the Prostate MR Imaging Study (PROMIS).
    Faria R; Soares MO; Spackman E; Ahmed HU; Brown LC; Kaplan R; Emberton M; Sculpher MJ
    Eur Urol; 2018 Jan; 73(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 28935163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid antigen detection and molecular tests for group A streptococcal infections for acute sore throat: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
    Fraser H; Gallacher D; Achana F; Court R; Taylor-Phillips S; Nduka C; Stinton C; Willans R; Gill P; Mistry H
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Jun; 24(31):1-232. PubMed ID: 32605705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis, monitoring and guiding of treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Mowatt G; Hernández R; Castillo M; Lois N; Elders A; Fraser C; Aremu O; Amoaku W; Burr J; Lotery A; Ramsay C; Azuara-Blanco A
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Dec; 18(69):1-254. PubMed ID: 25436855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Value of endorectal MRI and MRS in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and previous negative biopsies to localize peripheral zone tumours.
    Cirillo S; Petracchini M; Della Monica P; Gallo T; Tartaglia V; Vestita E; Ferrando U; Regge D
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Aug; 63(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 18625351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-Effectiveness of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.
    Rezapour A; Alipour V; Moradi N; Arabloo J
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2022 Jul; 30():31-38. PubMed ID: 35042021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combined T2 and diffusion-weighted MR imaging with template prostate biopsies in men suspected with prostate cancer but negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies.
    Sheikh N; Wei C; Szewczyk-Bieda M; Campbell A; Memon S; Lang S; Nabi G
    World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):213-220. PubMed ID: 27236302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate can improve the predictive value of the urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 test in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and a previous negative biopsy.
    Sciarra A; Panebianco V; Cattarino S; Busetto GM; De Berardinis E; Ciccariello M; Gentile V; Salciccia S
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1661-5. PubMed ID: 22564540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 77.