These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23697543)

  • 1. Utility of a writing station in the multiple mini-interview.
    Raghavan M; Burnett M; Martin BD; Christensen H; Young DG; Mackalski B; Aoki F
    J Vet Med Educ; 2013; 40(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 23697543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A generalizability analysis of a veterinary school Multiple Mini Interview: effect of number of interviewers, type of interviewers, and number of stations.
    Hecker K; Violato C
    Teach Learn Med; 2011 Oct; 23(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 22004317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview.
    Lemay JF; Lockyer JM; Collin VT; Brownell AK
    Med Educ; 2007 Jun; 41(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 17518837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of applicants to the veterinary curriculum using a multiple mini-interview method.
    Hecker K; Donnon T; Fuentealba C; Hall D; Illanes O; Morck DW; Muelling C
    J Vet Med Educ; 2009; 36(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 19625664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple mini-interview scores of medical school applicants with and without rural attributes.
    Raghavan M; Martin BD; Burnett M; Aoki F; Christensen H; Mackalski B; Young DG; Ripstein I
    Rural Remote Health; 2013; 13(2):2362. PubMed ID: 23574402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of Z-scores to rank applicants to professional degree programs.
    Raghavan M; Martin BD; Aoki F; Mackalski B; Christensen H
    J Vet Med Educ; 2013; 40(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 23475414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.
    Razack S; Faremo S; Drolet F; Snell L; Wiseman J; Pickering J
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 19769649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview?
    Pau A; Chen YS; Lee VK; Sow CF; De Alwis R
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():29874. PubMed ID: 26873337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How Medical School Applicant Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status Relate to Multiple Mini-Interview-Based Admissions Outcomes: Findings From One Medical School.
    Jerant A; Fancher T; Fenton JJ; Fiscella K; Sousa F; Franks P; Henderson M
    Acad Med; 2015 Dec; 90(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 26017355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The multiple mini-interview: how long is long enough?
    Dodson M; Crotty B; Prideaux D; Carne R; Ward A; de Leeuw E
    Med Educ; 2009 Feb; 43(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 19161488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The multiple mini-interview for selection of international medical graduates into family medicine residency education.
    Hofmeister M; Lockyer J; Crutcher R
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 19493182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Differential Weighting of Academics, Experiences, and Competencies Measured by Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) on Race and Ethnicity of Cohorts Accepted to One Medical School.
    Terregino CA; McConnell M; Reiter HI
    Acad Med; 2015 Dec; 90(12):1651-7. PubMed ID: 26488572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychometric properties of the multiple mini-interview used for medical admissions: findings from generalizability and Rasch analyses.
    Sebok SS; Luu K; Klinger DA
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2014 Mar; 19(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 23709188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The utility of multiple mini-interviews: experience of a medical school.
    Kim KJ; Nam KS; Kwon BS
    Korean J Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 29(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 28264549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple mini-interview test characteristics: 'tis better to ask candidates to recall than to imagine.
    Eva KW; Macala C
    Med Educ; 2014 Jun; 48(6):604-13. PubMed ID: 24807436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhancing the reliability of the multiple mini-interview for selecting prospective health care leaders.
    Uijtdehaage S; Doyle L; Parker N
    Acad Med; 2011 Aug; 86(8):1032-9. PubMed ID: 21694560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increasing the enrolment of rural applicants to the faculty of medicine and addressing diversity by using a priority matrix approach to assign values to rural attributes.
    Raghavan M; Martin BD; Roberts D; Aoki F; MacKalski BA; Sandham JD
    Rural Remote Health; 2011; 11(2):1646. PubMed ID: 21615195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees.
    Eva KW; Reiter HI; Trinh K; Wasi P; Rosenfeld J; Norman GR
    Med Educ; 2009 Aug; 43(8):767-75. PubMed ID: 19659490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does applicant personality influence multiple mini-interview performance and medical school acceptance offers?
    Jerant A; Griffin E; Rainwater J; Henderson M; Sousa F; Bertakis KD; Fenton JJ; Franks P
    Acad Med; 2012 Sep; 87(9):1250-9. PubMed ID: 22836836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are Female Applicants Rated Higher Than Males on the Multiple Mini-Interview? Findings From the University of Calgary.
    Ross M; Walker I; Cooke L; Raman M; Ravani P; Coderre S; McLaughlin K
    Acad Med; 2017 Jun; 92(6):841-846. PubMed ID: 28557950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.