These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23697622)

  • 1. Glaucoma screening: current perspectives and future directions.
    Momont AC; Mills RP
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2013 May; 28(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 23697622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Glaucoma screening: current trends, economic issues, technology, and challenges.
    Nduaguba C; Lee RK
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 17(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 16552249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cost-effectiveness of routine office-based identification and subsequent medical treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma in the United States.
    Rein DB; Wittenborn JS; Lee PP; Wirth KE; Sorensen SW; Hoerger TJ; Saaddine JB
    Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):823-32. PubMed ID: 19285730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Glaucoma today: detection and therapeutic progress].
    Baudouin C; Denoyer A; Rostène W
    Biol Aujourdhui; 2013; 207(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 24103339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Modern diagnostic methods for suspected glaucoma and glaucoma].
    Vass C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Apr; 221(4):227-46. PubMed ID: 15118952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic considerations of the diagnosis and management for glaucoma in the developed world.
    Tuulonen A
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 22(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 21192264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost effectiveness and cost utility of an organized screening programme for glaucoma.
    Vaahtoranta-Lehtonen H; Tuulonen A; Aronen P; Sintonen H; Suoranta L; Kovanen N; Linna M; Läärä E; Malmivaara A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Aug; 85(5):508-18. PubMed ID: 17655612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A survey and comparative study on the instruments for glaucoma detection.
    Lim TC; Chattopadhyay S; Acharya UR
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Mar; 34(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 21862378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnosing glaucoma progression: current practice and promising technologies.
    Giangiacomo A; Garway-Heath D; Caprioli J
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 17(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 16552250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of combined GDx-VCC and matrix FDT in a glaucoma screening trial.
    Tóth M; Kóthy P; Vargha P; Holló G
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Aug; 16(5):462-70. PubMed ID: 17700289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The medicare glaucoma screening benefit: a critical program that misses its target.
    Gower EW; Whiteside-de Vos J; Cassard SD; Shekhawat NS; Friedman DS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 156(2):211-212.e2. PubMed ID: 23870357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Population-based screening versus case detection.
    Thomas R; Parikh R; Paul P; Muliyil J
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 50(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 12355704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Update on glaucoma diagnosis and follow-up].
    González de la Rosa MA
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2003 Jun; 78(6):299-314. PubMed ID: 12838462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The utility of relative afferent pupillary defect as a screening tool for glaucoma: prospective examination of a large population-based study in a south Indian population.
    Hennessy AL; Katz J; Ramakrishnan R; Krishnadas R; Thulasiraj RD; Tielsch JM; Robin AL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2011 Sep; 95(9):1203-6. PubMed ID: 21349935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effectiveness of teleglaucoma versus in-patient examination for glaucoma screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Thomas SM; Jeyaraman MM; Hodge WG; Hutnik C; Costella J; Malvankar-Mehta MS
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e113779. PubMed ID: 25479593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early diagnosis in glaucoma.
    Garway-Heath DF
    Prog Brain Res; 2008; 173():47-57. PubMed ID: 18929101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New glaucoma diagnostic technologies: a systematic review of economic studies.
    Tarride JE; Burke N; Hopkins RB; Goeree R; Hodge WG
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 46(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 21283168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Glaucoma care cost-effectiveness.
    Hoskins HD
    Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):1016. PubMed ID: 19410965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increased Long-term measurement variability with scanning laser polarimetry employing enhanced corneal compensation: an early sign of glaucoma progression.
    Tóth M; Holló G
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(7):571-7. PubMed ID: 18854736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.