These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23698406)

  • 1. Pure hype of pure research helps no one.
    Sarewitz D
    Nature; 2013 May; 497(7450):411. PubMed ID: 23698406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Don't create a climate of fear.
    Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6961):885. PubMed ID: 14586426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Science under attack.
    Nature; 2009 Aug; 460(7256):667. PubMed ID: 19661864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluate this.
    Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7080):1-2. PubMed ID: 16511449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No political interference in US agricultural grants.
    Vidaver A
    Nature; 2005 Jan; 433(7022):105. PubMed ID: 15650714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Basic research: goddess and cow.
    Nichols RW
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7314):400. PubMed ID: 20864981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. US officials urge biologists to vet publications for bioterror risk.
    Check E
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):197. PubMed ID: 12529597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subpoenas and science--when lawyers force their way into the laboratory.
    Black B
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Mar; 336(10):725-7. PubMed ID: 9041107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. U.S. science policy. Bill would set new rules for choosing NSF grants.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2013 May; 340(6132):534. PubMed ID: 23641083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Australian scientists protest at loss of funding board.
    Dennis C
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7050):451. PubMed ID: 16049440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Science, politics, and federal advisory committees.
    Steinbrook R
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(14):1454-60. PubMed ID: 15070798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision making: leadership responsibilities and cautions.
    Patton DE; Olin SS
    Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 16492173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Banish cronyism.
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7421):446. PubMed ID: 23099363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Don't let ideology trump science.
    Leshner AI
    Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5650):1479. PubMed ID: 14645812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sitting in judgement.
    Check E
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mind games.
    Nature; 2007 Nov; 450(7169):457. PubMed ID: 18033254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Congressional Politics and Peer Review.
    Elwood TW
    J Allied Health; 2017; 46(4):203. PubMed ID: 29202153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The implications of the 2000 election.
    Blendon RJ; Altman DE; Benson JM; Brodie M
    N Engl J Med; 2001 Mar; 344(9):679-84. PubMed ID: 11228287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Russia turns screw on science foundation.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2015 May; 521(7552):273. PubMed ID: 25993939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.