These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Attention and entrainment: P3b varies as a function of temporal predictability. Schmidt-Kassow M; Schubotz RI; Kotz SA Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18987559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm. Thomaschke R; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2309-22. PubMed ID: 21755419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Target- and effect-directed actions towards temporal goals: similar mechanisms? Walter AM; Rieger M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):958-74. PubMed ID: 22686693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impaired reproduction of second but not millisecond time intervals in Parkinson's disease. Koch G; Costa A; Brusa L; Peppe A; Gatto I; Torriero S; Gerfo EL; Salerno S; Oliveri M; Carlesimo GA; Caltagirone C Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1305-13. PubMed ID: 18215403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The timing and temporal patterns of eye blinking are dynamically modulated by attention. Oh J; Jeong SY; Jeong J Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Dec; 31(6):1353-65. PubMed ID: 22877514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The scope and precision of specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm. Thomaschke R; Wagener A; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):953-64. PubMed ID: 21264746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrasting effects of interference and of breaks in interval timing. Gaudreault R; Fortin C; Macar F Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jan; 133(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 19716109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention. Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task. Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of basal ganglia lesions on sensorimotor synchronization, spontaneous motor tempo, and the detection of tempo changes. Schwartze M; Keller PE; Patel AD; Kotz SA Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 216(2):685-91. PubMed ID: 20883725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Motor action reduces temporal asynchrony between perceived visual changes. Corveleyn X; López-Moliner J; Coello Y J Vis; 2012 Oct; 12(11):20. PubMed ID: 23092948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Timing, storage, and comparison of stimulus duration engage discrete anatomical components of a perceptual timing network. Coull JT; Nazarian B; Vidal F J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2185-97. PubMed ID: 18457512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transfer of time-based task expectancy across different timing environments. Aufschnaiter S; Kiesel A; Thomaschke R Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):230-243. PubMed ID: 28741028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Song JH; Nakayama K Trends Cogn Sci; 2009 Aug; 13(8):360-6. PubMed ID: 19647475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Orienting attention in time activates left intraparietal sulcus for both perceptual and motor task goals. Davranche K; Nazarian B; Vidal F; Coull J J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3318-30. PubMed ID: 21452942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The limits of attention for visual perception and action in aging. Lee TY; Hsieh S Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2009 May; 16(3):311-29. PubMed ID: 19301162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]