These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23700096)
1. Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation. Kow N; Goldman HB; Ridgeway B Curr Urol Rep; 2013 Oct; 14(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 23700096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sacrohysteropexy: A Way to Spare the Uterus. Labanca L; Centini G; Lazzeri L; Afors K; Argay IM; Habib N; Zupi E J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1254-1255. PubMed ID: 31838275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction. Fink K; Shachar IB; Braun NM Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 27564289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of uterine volume on surgical outcomes following uterine preserving apical prolapse repair. Chill HH; Cohen A; Dick A; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Feb; 281():49-53. PubMed ID: 36535070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How do patients and surgeons decide on uterine preservation or hysterectomy in apical prolapse? Anglim B; O'Sullivan O; O'Reilly B Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1075-1079. PubMed ID: 29947819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study. Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse? Gutman RE Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 27467823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction. Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: 10 years' experience. Jefferis H; Price N; Jackson S Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1241-1248. PubMed ID: 28101639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy. Daniels S; Robson D; Palacz M; Howell S; Nguyen T; Behnia-Willison F Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 60(2):244-249. PubMed ID: 31840811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women. Geoffrion R; Larouche M J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review. Diwan A; Rardin CR; Kohli N Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2004; 15(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 15517676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hysteropexy: an Option for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Bradley S; Gutman RE; Richter LA Curr Urol Rep; 2018 Feb; 19(2):15. PubMed ID: 29476274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs. Hemming C; Constable L; Goulao B; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Elders A; Cooper K; Smith A; Freeman R; Breeman S; McDonald A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Norrie J; Glazener C Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(13):1-220. PubMed ID: 32138809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Glazener C; Constable L; Hemming C; Breeman S; Elders A; Cooper K; Freeman R; Smith AR; Hagen S; McDonald A; McPherson G; Montgomery I; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Goulao B; Norrie J Trials; 2016 Sep; 17(1):441. PubMed ID: 27609058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]