These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23700260)
1. A new method for apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using sequential (18)F-FDG PET and MRI: correlation with histological grade of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Byun BH; Noh WC; Lim I; Lee SS; Cho AR; Park JA; Kim KM; Kim HA; Kim EK; Kim BI; Choi CW; Lim SM Ann Nucl Med; 2013 Oct; 27(8):720-8. PubMed ID: 23700260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of Jena A; Taneja S; Singh A; Negi P; Sarin R; Das PK; Singhal M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):662-670. PubMed ID: 28678576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 18F-FDG uptake by metastatic axillary lymph nodes on pretreatment PET/CT as a prognostic factor for recurrence in patients with invasive ductal breast cancer. Song BI; Lee SW; Jeong SY; Chae YS; Lee WK; Ahn BC; Lee J J Nucl Med; 2012 Sep; 53(9):1337-44. PubMed ID: 22870824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors. Karan B; Pourbagher A; Torun N J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 26663655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective Correlation of Prognostic Immunohistochemical Markers With SUV and ADC Derived From Dedicated Hybrid Breast 18F-FDG PET/MRI in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer. Morawitz J; Kirchner J; Martin O; Bruckmann NM; Dietzel F; Li Y; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Umutlu L; Bittner AK; Mohrmann S; Ingenwerth M; Häberle L; Esposito I; Antoch G; Buchbender C; Sawicki LM Clin Nucl Med; 2021 Mar; 46(3):201-205. PubMed ID: 33351505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of tumor differentiation using sequential PET/CT and MRI in patients with breast cancer. Choi JH; Lim I; Noh WC; Kim HA; Seong MK; Jang S; Seol H; Moon H; Byun BH; Kim BI; Choi CW; Lim SM Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 32(6):389-397. PubMed ID: 29797002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrated PET/MR mammography for quantitative analysis and correlation to prognostic factors of invasive ductal carcinoma. Kong E; Chun KA; Bae YK; Cho IH Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Mar; 62(1):118-126. PubMed ID: 26784940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions: initial results. Heusch P; Buchbender C; Köhler J; Nensa F; Beiderwellen K; Kühl H; Lanzman RS; Wittsack HJ; Gomez B; Gauler T; Schuler M; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA Rofo; 2013 Nov; 185(11):1056-62. PubMed ID: 23860802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma. Jung NY; Kim SH; Choi BB; Kim SH; Sung MS World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 13():113. PubMed ID: 25889560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient with simultaneous MR/positron emission tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: comparison with 18F-FDG-PET. Schwenzer NF; Schmidt H; Gatidis S; Brendle C; Müller M; Königsrainer I; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg AC; Schraml C J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 40(5):1121-8. PubMed ID: 24923481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PET/MR in invasive ductal breast cancer: correlation between imaging markers and histological phenotype. Catalano OA; Horn GL; Signore A; Iannace C; Lepore M; Vangel M; Luongo A; Catalano M; Lehman C; Salvatore M; Soricelli A; Catana C; Mahmood U; Rosen BR Br J Cancer; 2017 Mar; 116(7):893-902. PubMed ID: 28208155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic and prognostic value of pretreatment SUV in 18F-FDG/PET in breast cancer: comparison with apparent diffusion coefficient from diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Baba S; Isoda T; Maruoka Y; Kitamura Y; Sasaki M; Yoshida T; Honda H J Nucl Med; 2014 May; 55(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 24665089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic value of primary tumor SUV Yoo J; Yoon HJ; Kim BS Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Jan; 31(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 27645144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of the SUVmax of FDG-PET and ADC values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma. Kitajima K; Yamano T; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y; Hirota S; Kawanaka Y; Miya M; Doi H; Yamakado K; Hirota S Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 27130054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Response to chemotherapy in gastric adenocarcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI and (18) F-FDG-PET/CT: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient and partial volume corrected standardized uptake value with histological tumor regression grade. Giganti F; De Cobelli F; Canevari C; Orsenigo E; Gallivanone F; Esposito A; Castiglioni I; Ambrosi A; Albarello L; Mazza E; Gianolli L; Staudacher C; Del Maschio A J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 40(5):1147-57. PubMed ID: 24214734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of FDG-PET/CT in evaluating surgical outcomes of operable breast cancer--usefulness for malignant grade of triple-negative breast cancer. Ohara M; Shigematsu H; Tsutani Y; Emi A; Masumoto N; Ozaki S; Kadoya T; Okada M Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):958-63. PubMed ID: 23756383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusion-weighted imaging and FDG PET/CT: predicting the prognoses with apparent diffusion coefficient values and maximum standardized uptake values in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma. Choi BB; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Lee JH; Song BJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW World J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 10():126. PubMed ID: 22741544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FDG PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging for breast cancer: prognostic value of maximum standardized uptake values and apparent diffusion coefficient values of the primary lesion. Nakajo M; Kajiya Y; Kaneko T; Kaneko Y; Takasaki T; Tani A; Ueno M; Koriyama C; Nakajo M Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Nov; 37(11):2011-20. PubMed ID: 20607535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI. Rakheja R; Chandarana H; DeMello L; Jackson K; Geppert C; Faul D; Glielmi C; Friedman KP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24147485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]