These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23701086)

  • 1. Correctly using sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values in clinical practice: how to avoid three common pitfalls.
    Naeger DM; Kohi MP; Webb EM; Phelps A; Ordovas KG; Newman TB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):W566-70. PubMed ID: 23701086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Turf wars in radiology: the future of radiology depends on research--and on your support of it!
    Levin DC; Rao VM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):184-6. PubMed ID: 17412260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High sensitivity and positive predictive value of fine-needle aspiration for uncommon thyroid malignancies.
    Dustin SM; Jo VY; Hanley KZ; Stelow EB
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 May; 40(5):416-21. PubMed ID: 21932354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy, risk and the intrinsic value of diagnostic imaging: a review of the cost-utility literature.
    Otero HJ; Fang CH; Sekar M; Ward RJ; Neumann PJ
    Acad Radiol; 2012 May; 19(5):599-606. PubMed ID: 22342653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computers in paediatrics. 18. Medical decision making: computer program to calculate sensitivity, specificity, false positive and negative rates, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of a diagnostic test.
    Yip WC; Tay JS; Ho TF; Wong HB
    J Singapore Paediatr Soc; 1986; 28(1-2):74-8. PubMed ID: 3531721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revised RECIST guideline version 1.1: What oncologists want to know and what radiologists need to know.
    Nishino M; Jagannathan JP; Ramaiya NH; Van den Abbeele AD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):281-9. PubMed ID: 20651182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Radiological diagnosis--current problems and achievements].
    Lindenbraten LD
    Klin Med (Mosk); 1991 Feb; 69(2):5-10. PubMed ID: 1875661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The American Board of Radiology perspective on maintenance of certification: Part IV--practice quality improvement in diagnostic radiology.
    Strife JL; Kun LE; Becker GJ; Dunnick NR; Bosma J; Hattery RR
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):631-6. PubMed ID: 17434077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive value of amniotic fluid index for oligohydramnios in patients with prolonged pregnancies.
    O'Reilly-Green CP; Divon MY
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1996; 5(4):218-26. PubMed ID: 8796797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The need for clinical trials in radiology.
    Hillman BJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Mar; 1(3):208-11. PubMed ID: 17411561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality--a radiology imperative: interpretation accuracy and pertinence.
    Lee JK
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 17412256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-extubation risk assessment tool: predictive validity in a real-life setting.
    Moons P; Boriau M; Ferdinande P
    Nurs Crit Care; 2008; 13(6):310-4. PubMed ID: 19128315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic procedures performed on the same group of patients.
    Hawass NE
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Apr; 70(832):360-6. PubMed ID: 9166071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Diagnostic efficiency on digital snapshots of the standard radiology imaging].
    Campanella N; Antico E; Dini L; Morosini P
    Recenti Prog Med; 2004 Dec; 95(12):566-9. PubMed ID: 15666487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of diagnostic tests.
    Gjørup T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1997; 166():9-14. PubMed ID: 9253371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of diagnostic efficacy in radiology. Literature review].
    Ries M; Malchair F; Gordenne W
    J Belge Radiol; 1990 Nov; 73(6):485-8. PubMed ID: 2277003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based radiology: step 3--primary literature validity (critical appraisal).
    Cronin P
    Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 19480898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Stepwise diagnostic workup in general practice as a consequence of the Bayesian reasoning].
    Schneider A; Dinant GJ; Szecsenyi J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 16686446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence-based radiology: step 1--ask.
    Kelly AM
    Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):140-6. PubMed ID: 19480896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based radiology: step 5--evaluate.
    Cronin P
    Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):182-3. PubMed ID: 19480903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.