These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23701158)

  • 1. Editorial review board.
    Chen C
    Int Surg; 2013; 98(2):i. PubMed ID: 23701158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Trainee Advisory Board: education, mentoring, and experience with the editorial process.
    McCarthy MJ; Tyrka AR
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2015 Dec; 132(6):429-30. PubMed ID: 26372406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On editorial practice and peer review.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):699-701. PubMed ID: 17683318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fortifying the external peer review: an editorial perspective.
    Sohail S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Jan; 25(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 25604359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Open peer review: a route to democracy.
    Pharaon S
    J R Soc Med; 2007 Jan; 100(1):9. PubMed ID: 17197678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nature journal's plan to fast track paper for a fee prompts resignation from editorial board.
    Hawkes N
    BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h1761. PubMed ID: 25829179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What's in a review?
    Nat Chem Biol; 2010 Apr; 6(4):245. PubMed ID: 20300090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to review a paper: suggestions from the editors of Surgery and the Journal of Surgical Research.
    McFadden DW; LeMaire SA; Sarr MG; Behrns KE
    J Surg Res; 2017 Jul; 215():264-268. PubMed ID: 28622935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical Mycology. Editorial.
    Salkin IF
    Med Mycol; 2012 Jan; 50(1):1. PubMed ID: 22172003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The tragedy of the reviewer commons.
    Hochberg ME; Chase JM; Gotelli NJ; Hastings A; Naeem S
    Ecol Lett; 2009 Jan; 12(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 19087107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review: should we modify our process?
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):463-4. PubMed ID: 24555581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Change to Open Peer Commentary format.
    Perlovsky L; Duermeijer C
    Phys Life Rev; 2010 Mar; 7(1):1. PubMed ID: 20374915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Editorial: CORR
    Leopold SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):297-299. PubMed ID: 27933443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Speed of Publication.
    Yates JR
    J Proteome Res; 2018 Mar; 17(3):935. PubMed ID: 29420038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Selected summaries].
    Müller-Lissner S
    Z Gastroenterol; 2011 Jul; 49(12):1525. PubMed ID: 22139874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supporting and enhancing peer review in the BJGP.
    Moore A; Jones R
    Br J Gen Pract; 2014 Jul; 64(624):e459-61. PubMed ID: 24982500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In praise of peer reviewers and the peer review process.
    Peternelj-Taylor C
    J Forensic Nurs; 2010; 6(4):159-61. PubMed ID: 21114756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double-blind peer review.
    Nat Chem Biol; 2015 Apr; 11(4):237. PubMed ID: 25785416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Online submission of manuscripts for "The Orthopedist."].
    Orthopade; 2012 Oct; 41(10):799. PubMed ID: 23052845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rebooting review.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2015 Apr; 33(4):319. PubMed ID: 25850037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.