BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23701389)

  • 21. Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect.
    Smith TA; Kimball DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 20053046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Semantic relations and repetition of items enhance the free recall of words by multiple sclerosis patients.
    Andrade VM; Oliveira MG; Miranda MC; Oliveira AS; Oliveira EM; Bueno OF
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Dec; 25(8):1070-8. PubMed ID: 14566581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Item-specific encoding produces an additional benefit of directed forgetting: evidence from intrusion errors.
    Sahakyan L; Delaney PF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1346-54. PubMed ID: 20804302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diminished but not forgotten: effects of aging on magnitude of spacing effect benefits.
    Simone PM; Bell MC; Cepeda NJ
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2013 Sep; 68(5):674-80. PubMed ID: 23103383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Directed forgetting in incidental learning and recognition testing: support for a two-factor account.
    Sahakyan L; Delaney PF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):789-801. PubMed ID: 16060780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spacing and lag effects in free recall of pure lists.
    Kahana MJ; Howard MW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):159-64. PubMed ID: 15948289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neural correlates of the spacing effect in explicit verbal semantic encoding support the deficient-processing theory.
    Callan DE; Schweighofer N
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Apr; 31(4):645-59. PubMed ID: 19882649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parallel effects of aging and time pressure on memory for source: evidence from the spacing effect.
    Benjamin AS; Craik FI
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Jul; 29(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 11531224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Learning concepts and categories: is spacing the "enemy of induction"?
    Kornell N; Bjork RA
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jun; 19(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 18578849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The negative testing and negative generation effects are eliminated by delay.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1014-25. PubMed ID: 25329076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The spacing effect in the free recall of homogeneous lists: present and accounted for.
    Toppino TC; Hara Y; Hackman J
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jun; 30(4):601-6. PubMed ID: 12184561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Forgetting in immediate serial recall: decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference?
    Oberauer K; Lewandowsky S
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Jul; 115(3):544-76. PubMed ID: 18729591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Learning and forgetting in schizophrenia.
    Gold JM; Rehkemper G; Binks SW; Carpenter CJ; Fleming K; Goldberg TE; Weinberger DR
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2000 Aug; 109(3):534-8. PubMed ID: 11016123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Massed versus spaced visuospatial memory in cognitively healthy young and older adults.
    Jackson CE; Maruff PT; Snyder PJ
    Alzheimers Dement; 2013 Feb; 9(1 Suppl):S32-8. PubMed ID: 23141386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The spacing effect, free recall, and two-process theory: a closer look.
    Toppino TC; Bloom LC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 May; 28(3):437-44. PubMed ID: 12018496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The spacing effect in intentional and incidental free recall by children and adults: Limits on the automaticity hypothesis.
    Toppino TC; Fearnow-Kenney MD; Kiepert MH; Teremula AC
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):316-25. PubMed ID: 19246346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Divided attention facilitates intentional forgetting: evidence from item-method directed forgetting.
    Lee YS; Lee HM
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):618-26. PubMed ID: 20880721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mechanisms underlying the spacing effect in learning: A comparison of three computational models.
    Walsh MM; Gluck KA; Gunzelmann G; Jastrzembski T; Krusmark M; Myung JI; Pitt MA; Zhou R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Sep; 147(9):1325-1348. PubMed ID: 30148385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spacing one's study: evidence for a metacognitive control strategy.
    Son LK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):601-4. PubMed ID: 15099128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: choices and consequences.
    Pashler H; Rohrer D; Cepeda NJ; Carpenter SK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Apr; 14(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 17694899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.