These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23702200)
21. Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female military recruits. Gaydos CA; Howell MR; Pare B; Clark KL; Ellis DA; Hendrix RM; Gaydos JC; McKee KT; Quinn TC N Engl J Med; 1998 Sep; 339(11):739-44. PubMed ID: 9731090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Internet-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to reach non-clinic populations with mailed self-administered vaginal swabs. Gaydos CA; Dwyer K; Barnes M; Rizzo-Price PA; Wood BJ; Flemming T; Hogan MT Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Jul; 33(7):451-7. PubMed ID: 16652069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Veldhuijzen IK; Broer J; Hoebe CJ; Steyerberg EW; Coenen AJ; de Groot F; Verhooren MJ; van Schaik DT; Richardus JH Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15681717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in nonurban family planning clinics in Wisconsin. Addiss DG; Vaughn ML; Holzhueter MA; Bakken LL; Davis JP Fam Plann Perspect; 1987; 19(6):252-6. PubMed ID: 3436412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands. van Bergen J; Götz HM; Richardus JH; Hoebe CJ; Broer J; Coenen AJ; Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15681716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis: results from the first national population-based survey in France. Goulet V; de Barbeyrac B; Raherison S; Prudhomme M; Semaille C; Warszawski J; Sex Transm Infect; 2010 Aug; 86(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 20660590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mailed urine samples are not an effective screening approach for Chlamydia trachomatis case finding among young men. Domeika M; Oscarsson L; Hallén A; Hjelm E; Sylvan S J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Jul; 21(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 17567309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Risk factors for Clamydia infections of the genital organs in adolescent females]. Sedlecki K; Markovic M; Rajic G Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001; 129(7-8):169-74. PubMed ID: 11797445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Risk assessment and other screening options for gonorrhoea and chlamydial infections in women attending rural Tanzanian antenatal clinics. Mayaud P; Grosskurth H; Changalucha J; Todd J; West B; Gabone R; Senkoro K; Rusizoka M; Laga M; Hayes R Bull World Health Organ; 1995; 73(5):621-30. PubMed ID: 8846488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Exploring the feasibility of alternative STD-testing venues and results delivery channels for a national screening campaign. Friedman AL; Bloodgood B Health Promot Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 21965593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. "It has to speak to people's everyday life...": qualitative study of men and women's willingness to participate in a non-medical approach to Chlamydia trachomatis screening. Lorimer K; Reid ME; Hart GJ Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Jun; 85(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 19106148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Recruitment via the Internet and social networking sites: the 1989-1995 cohort of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Mishra GD; Hockey R; Powers J; Loxton D; Tooth L; Rowlands I; Byles J; Dobson A J Med Internet Res; 2014 Dec; 16(12):e279. PubMed ID: 25514159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Familiarity and prevalence of Facebook use for social networking among individuals with traumatic brain injury. Tsaousides T; Matsuzawa Y; Lebowitz M Brain Inj; 2011; 25(12):1155-62. PubMed ID: 21961574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Chlamydia trachomatis infections among women attending prenatal clinics: United States, 2004-2009. Satterwhite CL; Gray AM; Berman S; Weinstock H; Kleinbaum D; Howards PP Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Jun; 39(6):416-20. PubMed ID: 22592825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Beyond Traditional Newspaper Advertisement: Leveraging Facebook-Targeted Advertisement to Recruit Long-Term Smokers for Research. Carter-Harris L; Bartlett Ellis R; Warrick A; Rawl S J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jun; 18(6):e117. PubMed ID: 27306780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Can we evaluate population screening strategies in UK general practice? A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing postal and opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection. Senok A; Wilson P; Reid M; Scoular A; Craig N; McConnachie A; Fitzpatrick B; MacDonald A J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Mar; 59(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 15709078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Screening university students for genital chlamydial infection: another lesson to learn. Aldeen T; Jacobs J; Powell R Sex Health; 2010 Dec; 7(4):491-4. PubMed ID: 21062592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Web-based recruiting for health research using a social networking site: an exploratory study. Fenner Y; Garland SM; Moore EE; Jayasinghe Y; Fletcher A; Tabrizi SN; Gunasekaran B; Wark JD J Med Internet Res; 2012 Feb; 14(1):e20. PubMed ID: 22297093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Young pregnant women's views on the acceptability of screening for chlamydia as part of routine antenatal care. Bilardi JE; De Guingand DL; Temple-Smith MJ; Garland S; Fairley CK; Grover S; Wallace E; Hocking JS; Tabrizi S; Pirotta M; Chen MY BMC Public Health; 2010 Aug; 10():505. PubMed ID: 20723264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]