136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23702678)
1. One-month test-retest reliability of the ImPACT test battery.
Schatz P; Ferris CS
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Aug; 28(5):499-504. PubMed ID: 23702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Examination of the Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test Battery.
Nakayama Y; Covassin T; Schatz P; Nogle S; Kovan J
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 42(8):2000-5. PubMed ID: 24907286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. One-year test-retest reliability of the online version of ImPACT in high school athletes.
Elbin RJ; Schatz P; Covassin T
Am J Sports Med; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2319-24. PubMed ID: 21841066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One year test-retest reliability of neurocognitive baseline scores in 10- to 12-year olds.
Moser RS; Schatz P; Grosner E; Kollias K
Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2017; 6(2):166-171. PubMed ID: 27182767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The test-retest reliability of three computerized neurocognitive tests used in the assessment of sport concussion.
Resch JE; Schneider MW; Munro Cullum C
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt A):31-38. PubMed ID: 28935224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A two-factor theory for concussion assessment using ImPACT: memory and speed.
Schatz P; Maerlender A
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Dec; 28(8):791-7. PubMed ID: 24123401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the suitability of the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) computerized neurocognitive battery for short-term, serial assessment of neurocognitive functioning.
Elbin RJ; Fazio-Sumrok V; Anderson MN; D'Amico NR; Said A; Grossel A; Schatz P; Lipinski D; Womble M
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 62():138-141. PubMed ID: 30472342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].
Bralet MC; Navarre M; Eskenazi AM; Lucas-Ross M; Falissard B
Encephale; 2008 Dec; 34(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 19081451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Concussion Test: CNS Vital Signs.
Littleton AC; Register-Mihalik JK; Guskiewicz KM
Sports Health; 2015; 7(5):443-7. PubMed ID: 26502421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ImPact test-retest reliability: reliably unreliable?
Resch J; Driscoll A; McCaffrey N; Brown C; Ferrara MS; Macciocchi S; Baumgartner T; Walpert K
J Athl Train; 2013; 48(4):506-11. PubMed ID: 23724770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of ImPACT for measuring processing speed following sports-related concussion.
Iverson GL; Lovell MR; Collins MW
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 Aug; 27(6):683-9. PubMed ID: 16019644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of using same- versus alternate-form memory tests during short-interval repeated assessments in multiple sclerosis.
Benedict RH
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2005 Oct; 11(6):727-36. PubMed ID: 16248908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 1 year test-retest reliability of ImPACT in professional ice hockey players.
Bruce J; Echemendia R; Meeuwisse W; Comper P; Sisco A
Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 24345194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sex differences in neuropsychological function and post-concussion symptoms of concussed collegiate athletes.
Covassin T; Schatz P; Swanik CB
Neurosurgery; 2007 Aug; 61(2):345-50; discussion 350-1. PubMed ID: 17762747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neuropsychological testing of high school athletes. Preliminary norms and test-retest indices.
Barr WB
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Jan; 18(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 14591481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term Stability and Reliability of Baseline Cognitive Assessments in High School Athletes Using ImPACT at 1-, 2-, and 3-year Test-Retest Intervals.
Brett BL; Smyk N; Solomon G; Baughman BC; Schatz P
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2016 Dec; 31(8):904-914. PubMed ID: 27538440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Test-retest reliability of computerized concussion assessment programs.
Broglio SP; Ferrara MS; Macciocchi SN; Baumgartner TA; Elliott R
J Athl Train; 2007; 42(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18174939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interpreting change on ImPACT following sport concussion.
Iverson GL; Lovell MR; Collins MW
Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Nov; 17(4):460-7. PubMed ID: 15168911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two-year Test-Retest Reliability in High School Athletes Using the Four- and Two-Factor ImPACT Composite Structures: The Effects of Learning Disorders and Headache/Migraine Treatment History.
Brett BL; Solomon GS; Hill J; Schatz P
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Mar; 33(2):216-226. PubMed ID: 28666316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Examining the stability of Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metric (ANAM) baseline test scores.
Kaminski TW; Groff RM; Glutting JJ
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Aug; 31(6):689-97. PubMed ID: 19110989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
