153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2370307)
1. Contribution of the cytobrush to determining cellular composition of cervical smears.
Doornewaard H; van der Graaf Y
J Clin Pathol; 1990 May; 43(5):393-6. PubMed ID: 2370307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sampling accuracy of the modified Ayre spatula/Zelsmyr Cytobrush versus the modified Ayre spatula/bulb aspirator in the collection of cells from the uterine cervix.
Selvaggi SM; Malviya V
Diagn Cytopathol; 1991; 7(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 1879271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cellular composition of cervical smears in relation to the day of the menstrual cycle and the method of contraception.
Vooijs GP; van der Graaf Y; Elias AG
Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 3604536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
Davey-Sullivan B; Gearhart J; Evers CG; Cason Z; Replogle WH
Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The efficiency of the cytobrush and cotton swab in obtaining endocervical cells in smears taken after conization of the cervix.
Kristensen GB; Jensen LK; Ejersbo D; Hølund B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 246(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 2619334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Cell-Sweep. A new cervical cytology sampling device.
Tyau L; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Edmonds P
J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov; 39(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 7853282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical follow-up of cervical sampling with the Ayre spatula and Zelsmyr cytobrush.
Crouse BJ; Elliott BA; Nesin N
Arch Fam Med; 1993 Feb; 2(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 8275183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
Chalvardjian A; De Marchi WG; Bell V; Nishikawa R
CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The unicum and cytobrush plus spatula for cervical cytologic sampling: a comparison.
Broso PR; Buffetti G; Fabbrini T; Francone P; Orlassino R
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(2):222-5. PubMed ID: 8629402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
Cannon JM; Blythe JG
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the cervical cytobrush and Ayre spatula compared with the extended-tip spatula.
Noel ML
J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989; 2(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 2665423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endocervical detection of CIN. Cytobrush versus cotton.
Schettino F; Sideri M; Cangini L; Candiani M; Zannoni E; Maggi R; Ferrari A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1993; 14(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 8508881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical cytology with the Papette sampler.
Ferenczy A; Robitaille J; Guralnick M; Shatz R
J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 8040849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety, efficacy and cost of three cervical cytology sampling devices in a prenatal clinic.
Smith-Levitin M; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):749-53. PubMed ID: 8913977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
Boon ME; Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Rietveld-Scheffers PE
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exact Touch: a new device for cervical cytology. Comparison with Ayre spatula plus Cytobrush.
de Palo G; Stefanon B; Alasio L; Pilotti S
Cytopathology; 2000 Oct; 11(5):322-5. PubMed ID: 11014659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
