These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2370307)

  • 1. Contribution of the cytobrush to determining cellular composition of cervical smears.
    Doornewaard H; van der Graaf Y
    J Clin Pathol; 1990 May; 43(5):393-6. PubMed ID: 2370307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sampling accuracy of the modified Ayre spatula/Zelsmyr Cytobrush versus the modified Ayre spatula/bulb aspirator in the collection of cells from the uterine cervix.
    Selvaggi SM; Malviya V
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1991; 7(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 1879271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cellular composition of cervical smears in relation to the day of the menstrual cycle and the method of contraception.
    Vooijs GP; van der Graaf Y; Elias AG
    Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 3604536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
    Davey-Sullivan B; Gearhart J; Evers CG; Cason Z; Replogle WH
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The efficiency of the cytobrush and cotton swab in obtaining endocervical cells in smears taken after conization of the cervix.
    Kristensen GB; Jensen LK; Ejersbo D; Hølund B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 246(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 2619334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Cell-Sweep. A new cervical cytology sampling device.
    Tyau L; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Edmonds P
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov; 39(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 7853282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical follow-up of cervical sampling with the Ayre spatula and Zelsmyr cytobrush.
    Crouse BJ; Elliott BA; Nesin N
    Arch Fam Med; 1993 Feb; 2(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 8275183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A; De Marchi WG; Bell V; Nishikawa R
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The unicum and cytobrush plus spatula for cervical cytologic sampling: a comparison.
    Broso PR; Buffetti G; Fabbrini T; Francone P; Orlassino R
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(2):222-5. PubMed ID: 8629402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
    Cannon JM; Blythe JG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
    Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the cervical cytobrush and Ayre spatula compared with the extended-tip spatula.
    Noel ML
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989; 2(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 2665423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
    Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endocervical detection of CIN. Cytobrush versus cotton.
    Schettino F; Sideri M; Cangini L; Candiani M; Zannoni E; Maggi R; Ferrari A
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1993; 14(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 8508881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical cytology with the Papette sampler.
    Ferenczy A; Robitaille J; Guralnick M; Shatz R
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 8040849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety, efficacy and cost of three cervical cytology sampling devices in a prenatal clinic.
    Smith-Levitin M; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):749-53. PubMed ID: 8913977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
    Boon ME; Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Rietveld-Scheffers PE
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exact Touch: a new device for cervical cytology. Comparison with Ayre spatula plus Cytobrush.
    de Palo G; Stefanon B; Alasio L; Pilotti S
    Cytopathology; 2000 Oct; 11(5):322-5. PubMed ID: 11014659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.