BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23703833)

  • 21. Getting intimate with trypsin, the leading protease in proteomics.
    Vandermarliere E; Mueller M; Martens L
    Mass Spectrom Rev; 2013; 32(6):453-65. PubMed ID: 23775586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of stable-isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture and spectral counting for relative quantification of protein expression.
    Collier TS; Randall SM; Sarkar P; Rao BM; Dean RA; Muddiman DC
    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2011 Sep; 25(17):2524-32. PubMed ID: 21818813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Amino-Terminal Oriented Mass Spectrometry of Substrates (ATOMS) N-terminal sequencing of proteins and proteolytic cleavage sites by quantitative mass spectrometry.
    Doucet A; Overall CM
    Methods Enzymol; 2011; 501():275-93. PubMed ID: 22078539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hydrophilic immobilized trypsin reactor with magnetic graphene oxide as support for high efficient proteome digestion.
    Jiang B; Yang K; Zhao Q; Wu Q; Liang Z; Zhang L; Peng X; Zhang Y
    J Chromatogr A; 2012 Sep; 1254():8-13. PubMed ID: 22871380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of empirical rule of linearly correlated peptide selection (ERLPS) for proteotypic peptide-based quantitative proteomics.
    Liu K; Zhang J; Fu B; Xie H; Wang Y; Qian X
    Proteomics; 2014 Jul; 14(13-14):1593-603. PubMed ID: 24827140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Proteomics beyond trypsin.
    Tsiatsiani L; Heck AJ
    FEBS J; 2015 Jul; 282(14):2612-26. PubMed ID: 25823410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantitative proteomics using 16O/18O labeling and linear ion trap mass spectrometry.
    López-Ferrer D; Ramos-Fernández A; Martínez-Bartolomé S; García-Ruiz P; Vázquez J
    Proteomics; 2006 Apr; 6 Suppl 1():S4-11. PubMed ID: 16534745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Proteome, phosphoproteome, and N-glycoproteome are quantitatively preserved in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue and analyzable by high-resolution mass spectrometry.
    Ostasiewicz P; Zielinska DF; Mann M; Wiśniewski JR
    J Proteome Res; 2010 Jul; 9(7):3688-700. PubMed ID: 20469934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of mouse liver membrane proteins using multidimensional separations and tandem mass spectrometry.
    Wang Z; Wang M; Tong W
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2010 Dec; 878(31):3259-66. PubMed ID: 21050830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vivo quantitative proteome profiling: planning and evaluation of SILAC experiments.
    Kirchner M; Selbach M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 893():175-99. PubMed ID: 22665302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mass spectrometric-based quantitative proteomics using SILAC.
    Lanucara F; Eyers CE
    Methods Enzymol; 2011; 500():133-50. PubMed ID: 21943896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative proteome analysis using isotope-coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry.
    Shiio Y; Aebersold R
    Nat Protoc; 2006; 1(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 17406225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In-depth quantitative cardiac proteomics combining electron transfer dissociation and the metalloendopeptidase Lys-N with the SILAC mouse.
    Scholten A; Mohammed S; Low TY; Zanivan S; van Veen TA; Delanghe B; Heck AJ
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2011 Oct; 10(10):O111.008474. PubMed ID: 21705516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the peptide characteristics of microwave- and ultrasound-assisted digestion in discovery and targeted proteomic analyses.
    Guo Z; Cheng J; Sun H; Sun W
    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2017 Aug; 31(16):1353-1362. PubMed ID: 28557149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Proteomics of Pyrococcus furiosus, a hyperthermophilic archaeon refractory to traditional methods.
    Lee AM; Sevinsky JR; Bundy JL; Grunden AM; Stephenson JL
    J Proteome Res; 2009 Aug; 8(8):3844-51. PubMed ID: 19425607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Production of 18O-single labeled peptide fragments during trypsin digestion of proteins for quantitative proteomics using nanoLC-ESI-MS/MS.
    Mori M; Abe K; Yamaguchi H; Goto J; Shimada M; Mano N
    J Proteome Res; 2010 Jul; 9(7):3741-9. PubMed ID: 20496949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing SILAC- and stable isotope dimethyl-labeling approaches for quantitative proteomics.
    Lau HT; Suh HW; Golkowski M; Ong SE
    J Proteome Res; 2014 Sep; 13(9):4164-74. PubMed ID: 25077673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of a protein-level and peptide-level labeling strategy for quantitative proteomics of synaptosomes using isobaric tags.
    Engmann O; Campbell J; Ward M; Giese KP; Thompson AJ
    J Proteome Res; 2010 May; 9(5):2725-33. PubMed ID: 20218731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Time resolved protein-based stable isotope probing (Protein-SIP) analysis allows quantification of induced proteins in substrate shift experiments.
    Taubert M; Jehmlich N; Vogt C; Richnow HH; Schmidt F; von Bergen M; Seifert J
    Proteomics; 2011 Jun; 11(11):2265-74. PubMed ID: 21598395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Addressing trypsin bias in large scale (phospho)proteome analysis by size exclusion chromatography and secondary digestion of large post-trypsin peptides.
    Tran BQ; Hernandez C; Waridel P; Potts A; Barblan J; Lisacek F; Quadroni M
    J Proteome Res; 2011 Feb; 10(2):800-11. PubMed ID: 21166477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.