These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

638 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23703887)

  • 1. Cognitive biases, linguistic universals, and constraint-based grammar learning.
    Culbertson J; Smolensky P; Wilson C
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jul; 5(3):392-424. PubMed ID: 23703887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian model of biases in artificial language learning: the case of a word-order universal.
    Culbertson J; Smolensky P
    Cogn Sci; 2012; 36(8):1468-98. PubMed ID: 22962854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning biases predict a word order universal.
    Culbertson J; Smolensky P; Legendre G
    Cognition; 2012 Mar; 122(3):306-29. PubMed ID: 22208785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Harmonic biases in child learners: in support of language universals.
    Culbertson J; Newport EL
    Cognition; 2015 Jun; 139():71-82. PubMed ID: 25800352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative standards for absolute linguistic universals.
    Piantadosi ST; Gibson E
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(4):736-56. PubMed ID: 24117660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A learning bias for word order harmony: Evidence from speakers of non-harmonic languages.
    Culbertson J; Franck J; Braquet G; Barrera Navarro M; Arnon I
    Cognition; 2020 Nov; 204():104392. PubMed ID: 32673786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The evolution of frequency distributions: relating regularization to inductive biases through iterated learning.
    Reali F; Griffiths TL
    Cognition; 2009 Jun; 111(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 19327759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Language learning, language use and the evolution of linguistic variation.
    Smith K; Perfors A; Fehér O; Samara A; Swoboda K; Wonnacott E
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2017 Jan; 372(1711):. PubMed ID: 27872370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implicational markedness and frequency in constraint-based computational models of phonological learning.
    Jarosz G
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):565-606. PubMed ID: 20307347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Language evolution can be shaped by the structure of the world.
    Perfors A; Navarro DJ
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(4):775-93. PubMed ID: 24460933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning a generative probabilistic grammar of experience: a process-level model of language acquisition.
    Kolodny O; Lotem A; Edelman S
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Mar; 39(2):227-67. PubMed ID: 24977647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning structural alternations: What guides learners' generalization?
    Lau SH; Momma S; Ferreira VS
    Cognition; 2021 Oct; 215():104828. PubMed ID: 34246914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning bias, cultural evolution of language, and the biological evolution of the language faculty.
    Smith K
    Hum Biol; 2011 Apr; 83(2):261-78. PubMed ID: 21615289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Language learning from positive evidence, reconsidered: a simplicity-based approach.
    Hsu AS; Chater N; Vitányi P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jan; 5(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 23335573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why formal learning theory matters for cognitive science.
    Fulop S; Chater N
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jan; 5(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 23335571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analyzing the rate at which languages lose the influence of a common ancestor.
    Rafferty AN; Griffiths TL; Klein D
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(7):1406-31. PubMed ID: 24646114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural network processing of natural language: II. Towards a unified model of corticostriatal function in learning sentence comprehension and non-linguistic sequencing.
    Dominey PF; Inui T; Hoen M
    Brain Lang; 2009; 109(2-3):80-92. PubMed ID: 18835637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive and linguistic biases in morphology learning.
    Finley S
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2018 Sep; 9(5):e1467. PubMed ID: 29847013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When global structure "Explains Away" local grammar: a Bayesian account of rule-induction in tone sequences.
    Dawson C; Gerken L
    Cognition; 2011 Sep; 120(3):350-9. PubMed ID: 21257161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Language evolution by iterated learning with bayesian agents.
    Griffiths TL; Kalish ML
    Cogn Sci; 2007 May; 31(3):441-80. PubMed ID: 21635304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.