These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23704860)

  • 1. Sensitivity to the acoustic correlates of lexical stress and their relationship to reading in skilled readers.
    Williams GJ; Wood C
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2012; 8(4):267-80. PubMed ID: 23704860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lexical Stress and Linguistic Predictability Influence Proofreading Behavior.
    Harris LN; Perfetti CA
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():96. PubMed ID: 26903904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. English Listeners Use Suprasegmental Cues to Lexical Stress Early During Spoken-Word Recognition.
    Jesse A; Poellmann K; Kong YY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):190-198. PubMed ID: 28056135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between children's sensitivity to dominant and non-dominant patterns of lexical stress and reading accuracy.
    Arciuli J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 May; 157():1-13. PubMed ID: 28088677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Spatial Frequencies on Word Identification by Fast and Slow Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements.
    Jordan TR; Dixon J; McGowan VA; Kurtev S; Paterson KB
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1433. PubMed ID: 27733837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-selective language activation in L2 lexical inference and text comprehension: Comparing skilled and less-skilled readers.
    Hu Z; Zhang H
    Heliyon; 2023 Jan; 9(1):e12818. PubMed ID: 36685444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recall of English function words and inflections by skilled and average deaf readers.
    Kelly LP
    Am Ann Deaf; 1993 Jul; 138(3):288-96. PubMed ID: 8213395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition.
    Binder JR; McKiernan KA; Parsons ME; Westbury CF; Possing ET; Kaufman JN; Buchanan L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):372-93. PubMed ID: 12729490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring Lexical Quality: The Role of Spelling Ability.
    Andrews S; Veldre A; Clarke IE
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Dec; 52(6):2257-2282. PubMed ID: 32291733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of context on processing words during sentence reading among adults varying in age and literacy skill.
    Steen-Baker AA; Ng S; Payne BR; Anderson CJ; Federmeier KD; Stine-Morrow EAL
    Psychol Aging; 2017 Aug; 32(5):460-472. PubMed ID: 28816473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The electrophysiological correlates of developmental dyslexia: New insights from lexical decision and reading aloud in adults.
    Mahé G; Pont C; Zesiger P; Laganaro M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Dec; 121():19-27. PubMed ID: 30389554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Principled Relation between Reading and Naming in Acquired and Developmental Anomia: Surface Dyslexia Following Impairment in the Phonological Output Lexicon.
    Gvion A; Friedmann N
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():340. PubMed ID: 27065897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parafoveal lexical activation depends on skilled reading proficiency.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):586-95. PubMed ID: 25068856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain activation for lexical decision and reading aloud: two sides of the same coin?
    Carreiras M; Mechelli A; Estévez A; Price CJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Mar; 19(3):433-44. PubMed ID: 17335392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential lexical predictors of reading comprehension in fourth graders.
    Swart NM; Muijselaar MML; Steenbeek-Planting EG; Droop M; de Jong PF; Verhoeven L
    Read Writ; 2017; 30(3):489-507. PubMed ID: 28255199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phonemic feature involvement in lexical access in grades 3 and 5: Evidence from visual and auditory lexical decision tasks.
    Sauval K; Perre L; Casalis S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jan; 182():212-219. PubMed ID: 29258652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reassessing word frequency as a determinant of word recognition for skilled and unskilled readers.
    Kuperman V; Van Dyke JA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):802-23. PubMed ID: 23339352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Holistic word processing is correlated with efficiency in visual word recognition.
    Ventura P; Fernandes T; Pereira A; Guerreiro JC; Farinha-Fernandes A; Delgado J; Ferreira MF; Faustino B; Raposo I; Wong AC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2739-2750. PubMed ID: 32077067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):219-32. PubMed ID: 25384238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: individual differences in masked form priming.
    Andrews S; Lo S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):152-63. PubMed ID: 21875252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.