These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23704860)

  • 61. Lexical activation during sentence comprehension in adolescents with history of Specific Language Impairment.
    Borovsky A; Burns E; Elman JL; Evans JL
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):413-27. PubMed ID: 24099807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The impact of skim reading and navigation when reading hyperlinks on the web.
    Fitzsimmons G; Jayes LT; Weal MJ; Drieghe D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239134. PubMed ID: 32941471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The impact of reader skill on phonological processing in visual word recognition.
    Unsworth SJ; Pexman PM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jan; 56(1):63-81. PubMed ID: 12587895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Contrasting effects of age of acquisition in lexical decision and letter detection.
    Assink EM; van Well S; Knuijt PP
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(3):367-87. PubMed ID: 14503391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Adapting to suprasegmental lexical stress errors in foreign-accented speech.
    Reinisch E; Weber A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1165-76. PubMed ID: 22894235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Factors distinguishing skilled and less skilled deaf readers: evidence from four orthographies.
    Miller P; Kargin T; Guldenoglu B; Rathmann C; Kubus O; Hauser P; Spurgeon E
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(4):439-62. PubMed ID: 22988294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Morphosyntactic but not lexical corpus-based probabilities can substitute for cloze probabilities in reading experiments.
    Lopukhina A; Lopukhin K; Laurinavichyute A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0246133. PubMed ID: 33508029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Lexical access versus lexical decision processes for auditory, visual, and audiovisual items: Insights from behavioral and neural measures.
    López Zunini RA; Baart M; Samuel AG; Armstrong BC
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107305. PubMed ID: 31838100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Is reading automatic? Are the ERP correlates of masked priming really lexical?
    Norris D; Kinoshita S; Hall J; Henson R
    Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 33(9):1152-1167. PubMed ID: 30246045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. How words and space collide: Lexical and sublexical reading are reliant on separable reflexive and voluntary attention regions in hybrid tasks.
    Ekstrand C; Neudorf J; Kress S; Borowsky R
    Cortex; 2019 Dec; 121():104-116. PubMed ID: 31561127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Evidence for a differential interference of noise in sub-lexical and lexical reading routes in healthy participants and dyslexics.
    Pina Rodrigues A; Rebola J; Jorge H; Ribeiro MJ; Pereira M; Castelo-Branco M; van Asselen M
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2017; 34(1-2):42-51. PubMed ID: 28353390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.
    Balota DA; Chumbley JI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Jun; 10(3):340-57. PubMed ID: 6242411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Low-frequency fine-structure cues allow for the online use of lexical stress during spoken-word recognition in spectrally degraded speech.
    Kong YY; Jesse A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):373. PubMed ID: 28147573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Beyond the initial 140 ms, lexical decision and reading aloud are different tasks: An ERP study with topographic analysis.
    Mahé G; Zesiger P; Laganaro M
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 122():65-72. PubMed ID: 26244274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Responses on a lateralized lexical decision task relate to both reading times and comprehension.
    Michael M
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):416-26. PubMed ID: 19559514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Individual Differences in Reading Speed are Linked to Variability in the Processing of Lexical and Contextual Information: Evidence from Single-trial Event-related Brain Potentials.
    Payne B; Federmeier KD
    Word (N Y : 1945); 2019; 65(4):252-272. PubMed ID: 33692598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Effects of deletion neighbourhood frequency and individual differences in lexical decision, progressive demasking, and naming.
    Dujardin E; Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2020 Jun; 74(2):111-124. PubMed ID: 31647252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Phonological processes in reading: new evidence from acquired dyslexia.
    Funnell E
    Br J Psychol; 1983 May; 74(Pt 2):159-80. PubMed ID: 6883008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Do different components of working memory underlie different subgroups of reading disabilities?
    Swanson HL; Howard CB; Sáez L
    J Learn Disabil; 2006; 39(3):252-69. PubMed ID: 16724796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Lexical Reading in Dysfluent Readers of German.
    Gangl M; Moll K; Jones MW; Banfi C; Schulte-Körne G; Landerl K
    Sci Stud Read; 2018; 22(1):24-40. PubMed ID: 29249911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.