BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23704896)

  • 1. Age-specific gene expression signatures for breast tumors and cross-species conserved potential cancer progression markers in young women.
    Colak D; Nofal A; Albakheet A; Nirmal M; Jeprel H; Eldali A; Al-Tweigeri T; Tulbah A; Ajarim D; Malik OA; Inan MS; Kaya N; Park BH; Bin Amer SM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63204. PubMed ID: 23704896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-cell genetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer reveals enormous tumor heterogeneity yet conserved genomic imbalances and gain of MYC during progression.
    Heselmeyer-Haddad K; Berroa Garcia LY; Bradley A; Ortiz-Melendez C; Lee WJ; Christensen R; Prindiville SA; Calzone KA; Soballe PW; Hu Y; Chowdhury SA; Schwartz R; Schäffer AA; Ried T
    Am J Pathol; 2012 Nov; 181(5):1807-22. PubMed ID: 23062488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of stromal signatures in the tumor microenvironment of ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Sharma M; Beck AH; Webster JA; Espinosa I; Montgomery K; Varma S; van de Rijn M; Jensen KC; West RB
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Sep; 123(2):397-404. PubMed ID: 19949854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expression profiling of in vivo ductal carcinoma in situ progression models identified B cell lymphoma-9 as a molecular driver of breast cancer invasion.
    Elsarraj HS; Hong Y; Valdez KE; Michaels W; Hook M; Smith WP; Chien J; Herschkowitz JI; Troester MA; Beck M; Inciardi M; Gatewood J; May L; Cusick T; McGinness M; Ricci L; Fan F; Tawfik O; Marks JR; Knapp JR; Yeh HW; Thomas P; Carrasco DR; Fields TA; Godwin AK; Behbod F
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Sep; 17():128. PubMed ID: 26384318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subtype-specific micro-RNA expression signatures in breast cancer progression.
    Haakensen VD; Nygaard V; Greger L; Aure MR; Fromm B; Bukholm IR; Lüders T; Chin SF; Git A; Caldas C; Kristensen VN; Brazma A; Børresen-Dale AL; Hovig E; Helland Å
    Int J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 139(5):1117-28. PubMed ID: 27082076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic and mutational profiling of ductal carcinomas in situ and matched adjacent invasive breast cancers reveals intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity and clonal selection.
    Hernandez L; Wilkerson PM; Lambros MB; Campion-Flora A; Rodrigues DN; Gauthier A; Cabral C; Pawar V; Mackay A; A'Hern R; Marchiò C; Palacios J; Natrajan R; Weigelt B; Reis-Filho JS
    J Pathol; 2012 May; 227(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 22252965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cis-acting super-enhancer lncRNAs as biomarkers to early-stage breast cancer.
    Ropri AS; DeVaux RS; Eng J; Chittur SV; Herschkowitz JI
    Breast Cancer Res; 2021 Oct; 23(1):101. PubMed ID: 34717732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Whole-Exome Sequencing Analysis of the Progression from Non-Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma
    Pareja F; Brown DN; Lee JY; Da Cruz Paula A; Selenica P; Bi R; Geyer FC; Gazzo A; da Silva EM; Vahdatinia M; Stylianou AA; Ferrando L; Wen HY; Hicks JB; Weigelt B; Reis-Filho JS
    Clin Cancer Res; 2020 Jul; 26(14):3682-3693. PubMed ID: 32220886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence that molecular changes in cells occur before morphological alterations during the progression of breast ductal carcinoma.
    Castro NP; Osório CA; Torres C; Bastos EP; Mourão-Neto M; Soares FA; Brentani HP; Carraro DM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2008; 10(5):R87. PubMed ID: 18928525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PIK3CA mutations in ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast cancer.
    Agahozo MC; Sieuwerts AM; Doebar SC; Verhoef EI; Beaufort CM; Ruigrok-Ritstier K; de Weerd V; Sleddens HFBM; Dinjens WNM; Martens JWM; van Deurzen CHM
    Endocr Relat Cancer; 2019 May; 26(5):471-482. PubMed ID: 30844755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparable cancer-relevant mutation profiles in synchronous ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
    Bergholtz H; Kumar S; Wärnberg F; Lüders T; Kristensen V; Sørlie T
    Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2020 Jun; 3(3):e1248. PubMed ID: 32671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional modelling identifies novel genetic dependencies associated with breast cancer progression in the isogenic MCF10 model.
    Maguire SL; Peck B; Wai PT; Campbell J; Barker H; Gulati A; Daley F; Vyse S; Huang P; Lord CJ; Farnie G; Brennan K; Natrajan R
    J Pathol; 2016 Nov; 240(3):315-328. PubMed ID: 27512948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of HER2 amplification status among breast cancer subgroups offers new insights in pathways of breast cancer progression.
    Lambein K; Van Bockstal M; Vandemaele L; Van den Broecke R; Cocquyt V; Geenen S; Denys H; Libbrecht L
    Virchows Arch; 2017 Nov; 471(5):575-587. PubMed ID: 28567637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-omic profiling of simultaneous ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
    Kaplan HG; Dowdell AK; Berry AB; Shimol RB; Robinson FL; Carney CA; Piening BD
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Jun; 205(3):451-464. PubMed ID: 38523186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing.
    Doebar SC; Krol NM; van Marion R; Brouwer RWW; van Ijcken WFJ; Martens JM; Dinjens WNM; van Deurzen CHM
    Virchows Arch; 2019 Feb; 474(2):247-251. PubMed ID: 30284611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extensive ductal carcinoma In situ with small foci of invasive ductal carcinoma: evidence of genetic resemblance by CGH.
    Aubele M; Mattis A; Zitzelsberger H; Walch A; Kremer M; Welzl G; Höfler H; Werner M
    Int J Cancer; 2000 Jan; 85(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 10585588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Progression-specific genes identified in microdissected formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue containing matched ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal breast cancers.
    Schultz S; Bartsch H; Sotlar K; Petat-Dutter K; Bonin M; Kahlert S; Harbeck N; Vogel U; Seeger H; Fehm T; Neubauer HJ
    BMC Med Genomics; 2018 Sep; 11(1):80. PubMed ID: 30236106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic differences between pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and that associated with invasive disease: a calibrated aCGH study.
    Iakovlev VV; Arneson NC; Wong V; Wang C; Leung S; Iakovleva G; Warren K; Pintilie M; Done SJ
    Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Jul; 14(14):4446-54. PubMed ID: 18628458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the importance of morphologic and molecular interactions.
    Mardekian SK; Bombonati A; Palazzo JP
    Hum Pathol; 2016 Mar; 49():114-23. PubMed ID: 26826418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gene Expression Differences between Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with and without Progression to Invasive Breast Cancer.
    Doebar SC; Sieuwerts AM; de Weerd V; Stoop H; Martens JWM; van Deurzen CHM
    Am J Pathol; 2017 Jul; 187(7):1648-1655. PubMed ID: 28634007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.