These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23705655)

  • 1. Amygdala mediated connectivity in perceptual decision-making of emotional facial expressions.
    Bajaj S; Lamichhane B; Adhikari BM; Dhamala M
    Brain Connect; 2013; 3(4):386-97. PubMed ID: 23705655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preferential amygdala reactivity to the negative assessment of neutral faces.
    Blasi G; Hariri AR; Alce G; Taurisano P; Sambataro F; Das S; Bertolino A; Weinberger DR; Mattay VS
    Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 66(9):847-53. PubMed ID: 19709644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emotions in motion: dynamic compared to static facial expressions of disgust and happiness reveal more widespread emotion-specific activations.
    Trautmann SA; Fehr T; Herrmann M
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1284():100-15. PubMed ID: 19501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neuroticism modulates amygdala-prefrontal connectivity in response to negative emotional facial expressions.
    Cremers HR; Demenescu LR; Aleman A; Renken R; van Tol MJ; van der Wee NJ; Veltman DJ; Roelofs K
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):963-70. PubMed ID: 19683585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effective connectivity during processing of facial affect: evidence for multiple parallel pathways.
    Dima D; Stephan KE; Roiser JP; Friston KJ; Frangou S
    J Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 31(40):14378-85. PubMed ID: 21976523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-related changes in amygdala-frontal connectivity during emotional face processing from childhood into young adulthood.
    Wu M; Kujawa A; Lu LH; Fitzgerald DA; Klumpp H; Fitzgerald KD; Monk CS; Phan KL
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 May; 37(5):1684-95. PubMed ID: 26931629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A neural network reflecting individual differences in cognitive processing of emotions during perceptual decision making.
    Mériau K; Wartenburger I; Kazzer P; Prehn K; Lammers CH; van der Meer E; Villringer A; Heekeren HR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(3):1016-27. PubMed ID: 16973382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Salience Network and Its Functional Architecture in a Perceptual Decision: An Effective Connectivity Study.
    Lamichhane B; Dhamala M
    Brain Connect; 2015 Aug; 5(6):362-70. PubMed ID: 25578366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Valence-Dependent Coupling of Prefrontal-Amygdala Effective Connectivity during Facial Affect Processing.
    Willinger D; Karipidis II; Beltrani S; Di Pietro SV; Sladky R; Walitza S; Stämpfli P; Brem S
    eNeuro; 2019; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 31289107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Activation of the amygdala and anterior cingulate during nonconscious processing of sad versus happy faces.
    Killgore WD; Yurgelun-Todd DA
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1215-23. PubMed ID: 15050549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Affective neural circuitry during facial emotion processing in pediatric bipolar disorder.
    Pavuluri MN; O'Connor MM; Harral E; Sweeney JA
    Biol Psychiatry; 2007 Jul; 62(2):158-67. PubMed ID: 17097071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive facial affect - an fMRI study on the involvement of insula and amygdala.
    Pohl A; Anders S; Schulte-Rüther M; Mathiak K; Kircher T
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e69886. PubMed ID: 23990890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Widespread and lateralized social brain activity for processing dynamic facial expressions.
    Sato W; Kochiyama T; Uono S; Sawada R; Kubota Y; Yoshimura S; Toichi M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Sep; 40(13):3753-3768. PubMed ID: 31090126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic facial expressions evoke distinct activation in the face perception network: a connectivity analysis study.
    Foley E; Rippon G; Thai NJ; Longe O; Senior C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Feb; 24(2):507-20. PubMed ID: 21861684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Amygdala functional connectivity during socioemotional processing prospectively predicts increases in internalizing symptoms in a sample of low-income, urban, young men.
    Gard AM; Waller R; Swartz JR; Shaw DS; Forbes EE; Hyde LW
    Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():562-573. PubMed ID: 29860084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In the eye of the beholder: internally driven uncertainty of danger recruits the amygdala and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex.
    Zaretsky M; Mendelsohn A; Mintz M; Hendler T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2263-75. PubMed ID: 19929759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception.
    Fairhall SL; Ishai A
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Oct; 17(10):2400-6. PubMed ID: 17190969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amygdala functional network during recognition of own-age vs. other-age faces in younger and older adults.
    Ziaei M; Persson J; Bonyadi MR; Reutens DC; Ebner NC
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jun; 129():10-20. PubMed ID: 30876765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Similarities and differences in perceiving threat from dynamic faces and bodies. An fMRI study.
    Kret ME; Pichon S; Grèzes J; de Gelder B
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(2):1755-62. PubMed ID: 20723605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children's processing of emotions expressed by peers and adults: an fMRI study.
    Hoehl S; Brauer J; Brasse G; Striano T; Friederici AD
    Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(5-6):543-59. PubMed ID: 20486013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.