These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23705995)

  • 1. The impacts of hypnotic susceptibility on chaotic dynamics of EEG signals during standard tasks of Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale.
    Yargholi E; Nasrabadi AM
    J Med Eng Technol; 2013 May; 37(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 23705995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recurrence quantification analysis of electroencephalograph signals during standard tasks of Waterloo-Stanford group scale of hypnotic susceptibility.
    Yargholi E; Nasrabadi AM
    J Med Eng Technol; 2015 Jan; 39(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 25367766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chaos-chaos transition of left hemisphere EEGs during standard tasks of Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility.
    Yargholi E; Nasrabadi AM
    J Med Eng Technol; 2015; 39(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 26000729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EEG phase synchronization during hypnosis induction.
    Baghdadi G; Nasrabadi AM
    J Med Eng Technol; 2012 May; 36(4):222-9. PubMed ID: 22439789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 40-Hz EEG activity during hypnotic induction and hypnotic testing.
    DePascalis V; Penna PM
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Apr; 38(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 2347669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 40-Hz EEG asymmetry during recall of emotional events in waking and hypnosis: differences between low and high hypnotizables.
    De Pascalis V; Marucci FS; Penna PM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1989 Mar; 7(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 2925468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lack of correlation between hypnotic susceptibility and various components of attention.
    Varga K; Németh Z; Szekely A
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1872-81. PubMed ID: 21963402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The phenomenology of the experiences and the depth of hypnosis: comparison of direct and indirect induction techniques.
    Szabó C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jul; 41(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 8335421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relation of self-reports of hypnotic depth in self-hypnosis to hypnotizability and imagery production.
    Kahn SP; Fromm E; Lombard LS; Sossi M
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Oct; 37(4):290-304. PubMed ID: 2793270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different EEG features in estimation of hypnosis susceptibility level.
    Baghdadi G; Nasrabadi AM
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 May; 42(5):590-7. PubMed ID: 22386148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EEG spectral analysis during hypnotic induction, hypnotic dream and age regression.
    De Pascalis V
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1993 Sep; 15(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 8244843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imagery and hypnotizability revisited.
    Kogon MM; Jasiukaitis P; Berardi A; Gupta M; Kosslyn SM; Spiegel D
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Oct; 46(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 9780527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective time estimation and hypnotizability in a simulator design.
    Mozenter RH; Kurtz RM
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1992 Jul; 40(3):169-79. PubMed ID: 1399154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The neurophenomenology of neutral hypnosis.
    Cardeña E; Jönsson P; Terhune DB; Marcusson-Clavertz D
    Cortex; 2013 Feb; 49(2):375-85. PubMed ID: 22579225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A note of caution on the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility: a brief communication.
    Cardeña E; Terhune DB
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2009 Apr; 57(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 19234968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility: normative and comparative data.
    Bowers KS
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jan; 41(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 8425774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychophysiological correlates of hypnosis and hypnotic susceptibility.
    de Pascalis V
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1999 Apr; 47(2):117-43. PubMed ID: 10208074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fractal analysis of EEG in hypnosis and its relationship with hypnotizability.
    Lee JS; Spiegel D; Kim SB; Lee JH; Kim SI; Yang BH; Choi JH; Kho YC; Nam JH
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2007 Jan; 55(1):14-31. PubMed ID: 17135061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hypnotic susceptibility, baseline attentional functioning, and the Stroop task.
    Rubichi S; Ricci F; Padovani R; Scaglietti L
    Conscious Cogn; 2005 Jun; 14(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 15950883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hypnotic dreams as a lens into hypnotic dynamics.
    Raz A; Schweizer HR; Zhu H; Bowles EN
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2010 Jan; 58(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 20183739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.