These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23706174)

  • 1. The accuracy of 'haptically' measured geographical slant perception.
    Taylor-Covill GA; Eves FF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Oct; 144(2):444-50. PubMed ID: 23706174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What hands know about objects; taking perception of hills out of context: a response to Durgin (2013).
    Taylor-Covill GA; Eves FF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Oct; 144(2):459-61. PubMed ID: 24011614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Explicit and motoric dependent measures of geographical slant are dissociable: a reassessment of the findings of Durgin, Hajnal, Li, Tonge, and Stigliani (2010).
    Proffitt DR; Zadra JR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Oct; 138(2):285-8. PubMed ID: 20605013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context.
    Durgin FH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Oct; 144(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 23938050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design, data, and theory regarding a digital hand inclinometer: a portable device for studying slant perception.
    Li Z; Durgin FH
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Jun; 43(2):363-71. PubMed ID: 21298570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Summarizing slant perception with words and hands; an empirical alternative to correlations in Shaffer, McManama, Swank, Williams & Durgin (2014).
    Eves FF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():77-81. PubMed ID: 25577490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Palm board and verbal estimates of slant reflect the same perceptual representation.
    Shaffer DM; Taylor A; McManama E; Thomas A; Smith E; Graves P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):663-73. PubMed ID: 26603041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Palm boards are not action measures: an alternative to the two-systems theory of geographical slant perception.
    Durgin FH; Hajnal A; Li Z; Tonge N; Stigliani A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):182-97. PubMed ID: 20176342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An imputed dissociation might be an artifact: Further evidence for the generalizability of the observations of Durgin et al. 2010.
    Durgin FH; Hajnal A; Li Z; Tonge N; Stigliani A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Oct; 138(2):281-4. PubMed ID: 20889135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pedal and haptic estimates of slant suggest a common underlying representation.
    Shaffer DM; Greer KM; Schaffer JT; Burkhardt M; Mattingly K; Short B; Cramer C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():194-199. PubMed ID: 30530170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Slant perception in near space is categorically biased: evidence for a vertical tendency.
    Durgin FH; Li Z; Hajnal A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1875-89. PubMed ID: 20952785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Remote haptic perception of slanted surfaces shows the same scale expansion as visual perception.
    Shaffer DM; McManama E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):948-52. PubMed ID: 25515432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of Stand-on-ability: Do Geographical Slants Feel Steeper Than They Look?
    Hajnal A; Wagman JB; Doyon JK; Clark JD
    Perception; 2016 Jul; 45(7):768-86. PubMed ID: 26979069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Free hand proprioception is well calibrated to verbal estimates of slanted surfaces.
    Shaffer DM; Taylor A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):691-697. PubMed ID: 27933458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Manual anchoring biases in slant estimation affect matches even for near surfaces.
    Shaffer DM; McManama E; Durgin FH
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1665-70. PubMed ID: 26350762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anchoring in action: manual estimates of slant are powerfully biased toward initial hand orientation and are correlated with verbal report.
    Shaffer DM; McManama E; Swank C; Williams M; Durgin FH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1203-12. PubMed ID: 24661067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of symmetry, texture, and monocular viewing on geographical slant estimation.
    Daum SO; Hecht H
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Sep; 64():183-195. PubMed ID: 29960827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Slant perception for stairs and screens: effects of sex and fatigue in a laboratory environment.
    Taylor-Covill GA; Eves FF
    Perception; 2013; 42(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 23866558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does perceived angular declination contribute to perceived optical slant on level ground?
    Li Z; Durgin FH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1609-1618. PubMed ID: 29856003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Seeing mountains in mole hills: geographical-slant perception.
    Proffitt DR; Creem SH; Zosh WD
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Sep; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 11554677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.