211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23706868)
1. The value of "liver windows" settings in the detection of small renal cell carcinomas on unenhanced computed tomography.
Sahi K; Jackson S; Wiebe E; Armstrong G; Winters S; Moore R; Low G
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2014 Feb; 65(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 23706868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can high-attenuation renal cysts be differentiated from renal cell carcinoma at unenhanced CT?
Jonisch AI; Rubinowitz AN; Mutalik PG; Israel GM
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):445-50. PubMed ID: 17456870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of virtual unenhanced images and split-bolus injection using spectral multidetector CT for the assessment of renal cell carcinoma conspicuity and radiation dose.
Wang W; Liu L; Zeng H; Sun C; Huang N; Zhang M
Int J Clin Pract; 2016 Sep; 70 Suppl 9B():B56-63. PubMed ID: 27577516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unenhanced CT for the diagnosis of minimal-fat renal angiomyolipoma.
Schieda N; Hodgdon T; El-Khodary M; Flood TA; McInnes MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):1236-41. PubMed ID: 25415700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma with hounsfield unit thresholds: effect of size of region of interest and nephrographic phase imaging.
Davenport MS; Neville AM; Ellis JH; Cohan RH; Chaudhry HS; Leder RA
Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):158-65. PubMed ID: 21555349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Kim JY; Kim JK; Kim N; Cho KS
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 18094264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic value of multidetector computed tomography for renal sinus fat invasion in renal cell carcinoma patients.
Kim C; Choi HJ; Cho KS
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jun; 83(6):914-918. PubMed ID: 24713489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinico-radio-pathologic features of a solitary solid renal mass at MDCT examination.
Kim EY; Park BK; Kim CK; Lee HM
Acta Radiol; 2010 Dec; 51(10):1143-8. PubMed ID: 20849320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Renal cell carcinoma attenuation values on unenhanced CT: importance of multiple, small region-of-interest measurements.
McGahan JP; Sidhar K; Fananapazir G; Early H; Corwin MT; Silverman SG; Seibert A
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Sep; 42(9):2325-2333. PubMed ID: 28389785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Solid Renal Cell Carcinoma Measuring Water Attenuation (-10 to 20 HU) on Unenhanced CT.
Schieda N; Vakili M; Dilauro M; Hodgdon T; Flood TA; Shabana WM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1215-21. PubMed ID: 26587928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat?
Catalano OA; Samir AE; Sahani DV; Hahn PF
Radiology; 2008 Jun; 247(3):738-46. PubMed ID: 18413886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT and subtraction CT for renal lesion detection and characterization.
Pourvaziri A; Parakh A; Mojtahed A; Kambadakone A; Sahani DV
Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6559-6570. PubMed ID: 31134365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Renal cell carcinoma: attenuation values on unenhanced CT.
Pooler BD; Pickhardt PJ; O'Connor SD; Bruce RJ; Patel SR; Nakada SY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1115-20. PubMed ID: 22528901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancement Threshold of Small (< 4 cm) Solid Renal Masses on CT.
Al Harbi F; Tabatabaeefar L; Jewett MA; Finelli A; O'Malley M; Atri M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar; 206(3):554-8. PubMed ID: 26901011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: discrimination from other renal cell carcinoma subtypes and oncocytoma at multiphasic multidetector CT.
Young JR; Margolis D; Sauk S; Pantuck AJ; Sayre J; Raman SS
Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):444-53. PubMed ID: 23382290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can Quantitative CT Texture Analysis be Used to Differentiate Fat-poor Renal Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma on Unenhanced CT Images?
Hodgdon T; McInnes MD; Schieda N; Flood TA; Lamb L; Thornhill RE
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):787-96. PubMed ID: 25906183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Segmental enhancement inversion at biphasic multidetector CT: characteristic finding of small renal oncocytoma.
Kim JI; Cho JY; Moon KC; Lee HJ; Kim SH
Radiology; 2009 Aug; 252(2):441-8. PubMed ID: 19508984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: differentiation on MDCT using classification and regression tree analysis-based algorithm.
Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SH; Kim SY
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1258-69. PubMed ID: 24259298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Qualitative and quantitative MDCT features for differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma from other solid renal cortical masses.
Lee-Felker SA; Felker ER; Tan N; Margolis DJ; Young JR; Sayre J; Raman SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):W516-24. PubMed ID: 25341166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
