108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2370735)
21. Developing issues in medical decision making: the durable power of attorney and institutional ethics committees.
Doudera AE
Prim Care; 1986 Jun; 13(2):315-26. PubMed ID: 3636934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In re guardianship of Grant.
Avila D
Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):247-9. PubMed ID: 2621098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The durable power of attorney for health care.
Ohio Med; 1989 Nov; 85(11):877-81. PubMed ID: 2601936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Power of attorney and guardianship: what we think we know..
Muller LS
Prof Case Manag; 2008; 13(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 18562912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Euthanasia in Maryland: the right to die with dignity?
Dailey ML
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1989; 5():297-317. PubMed ID: 10313058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Right to die dilemma: when parents don't agree.
Cabrera OJ; Adelson DE
Healthspan; 1990 Nov; 7(10):13-8. PubMed ID: 10107733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. How the Health Care Surrogate Act of 1993 will simplify medical care in West Virginia.
Moss AH; Kelly PD; Delaura G
W V Med J; 1993 Jul; 89(7):274-5. PubMed ID: 8351897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept?
Liacos PJ
Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 2621092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept?
Robertson ED
Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):197-214. PubMed ID: 2621091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Informed consent for people with diminished capacity to consent.
Whyman RA; Rose D
N Z Dent J; 2001 Dec; 97(430):137-9. PubMed ID: 11887664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Aging and dependence: toward a redefinition of autonomy.
Weinberg JK
Soc Casework; 1987 Nov; 68(9):522-32. PubMed ID: 10284751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Deciding for others.
Meisel A
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):48-9. PubMed ID: 2228590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Questionable competency of a surrogate decision maker under a durable power of attorney.
McCrary SV; Allen WL; Young CL
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 8334280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Substitute consent to health care: patients' rights vs responsibility to provide care.
Barkin M
Health Law Can; 1988; 8(4):87-8. PubMed ID: 10312620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. In re Jane Doe.
Barkow JM
Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):243-4. PubMed ID: 2621096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The right to die versus the right to live--who decides? The long and wandering road to a legislative solution.
Mazzeo KE
Albany Law Rev; 2002-2003; 66(1):263-87. PubMed ID: 12484391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Surrogate decision-making legislation: the next frontier in life-sustaining treatment policy.
Portman RM
J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Oct; 24(10):311-9. PubMed ID: 10114557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Revising the substituted judgment standard.
Baergen R
J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 7632994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
Harner SR
Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Durable power of attorney for health care.
Fish DG
N Engl J Med; 1984 Oct; 311(14):924-5. PubMed ID: 6472417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
