These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23707818)
1. Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA)-psychometric properties of a new field-deployable neurocognitive assessment tool. Lathan C; Spira JL; Bleiberg J; Vice J; Tsao JW Mil Med; 2013 Apr; 178(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 23707818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance on the Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment across controlled environmental conditions. Haran FJ; Dretsch MN; Bleiberg J Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2016; 23(6):411-7. PubMed ID: 27182844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized cognitive testing norms in active-duty military personnel: Potential for contamination by psychologically unhealthy individuals. Coffman I; Resnick HE; Drane J; Lathan CE Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2018; 25(6):497-503. PubMed ID: 28605213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance on the DANA Brief Cognitive Test Correlates With MACE Cognitive Score and May Be a New Tool to Diagnose Concussion. Pryweller JR; Baughman BC; Frasier SD; O'Conor EC; Pandhi A; Wang J; Morrison AA; Tsao JW Front Neurol; 2020; 11():839. PubMed ID: 32982908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reference values for performance on the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics V3.0 in an active duty military sample. Reeves DL; Bleiberg J; Roebuck-Spencer T; Cernich AN; Schwab K; Ivins B; Salazar AM; Harvey SC; Brown FH; Warden D Mil Med; 2006 Oct; 171(10):982-94. PubMed ID: 17076451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An Evaluation of the Consistency and Reliability of the Defense Automated Neurocognitive Assessment Tool. Russo CR; Lathan CE Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Oct; 39(7):566-572. PubMed ID: 29881027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PHIT for duty, a mobile approach for psychological health intervention. Kizakevich PN; Hubal R; Brown J; Lyden J; Spira J; Eckhoff R; Zhang Y; Bryant S; Munoz G Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 181():268-72. PubMed ID: 22954869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The ARES test system for palm OS handheld computers. Elsmore TF; Reeves DL; Reeves AN Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Feb; 22 Suppl 1():S135-44. PubMed ID: 17166694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neurocognitive performance and prior injury among U.S. Department of Defense military personnel. Proctor SP; Nieto K; Heaton KJ; Dillon CC; Schlegel RE; Russell ML; Vincent AS Mil Med; 2015 Jun; 180(6):660-9. PubMed ID: 26032381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eight-Day Temporal Stability of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metric (ANAM) in a Deployment Environment. Dretsch M; Parish R; Kelly M; Coldren R; Russell M Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2015; 22(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25531697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Test-retest reliability of four computerized neurocognitive assessment tools in an active duty military population. Cole WR; Arrieux JP; Schwab K; Ivins BJ; Qashu FM; Lewis SC Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Nov; 28(7):732-42. PubMed ID: 23819991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychometric comparison of computerized and standard administration of the neurocognitive assessment instruments selected by the CATIE and MATRICS consortia among patients with schizophrenia. O'Halloran JP; Kemp AS; Gooch KN; Harvey PD; Palmer BW; Reist C; Schneider LS Schizophr Res; 2008 Nov; 106(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 18160262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of the Virtual Reality Stroop Task (VRST) in active duty military. Armstrong CM; Reger GM; Edwards J; Rizzo AA; Courtney CG; Parsons TD J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2013; 35(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 23157431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Virtual reality paced serial assessment test for neuropsychological assessment of a military cohort. Parsons TD; Courtney C; Rizzo AA; Armstrong C; Edwards J; Reger G Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 173():331-7. PubMed ID: 22357013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychometric equivalence of a paper-based and computerized (iPad) version of the Memory Orientation Screening Test (MOST®). Clionsky M; Clionsky E Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 24815733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical procedures for the neuropsychological evaluation of U.S. Air Force pilots. Retzlaff PD; Callister JD; King RE Mil Med; 1999 Jul; 164(7):514-9. PubMed ID: 10414068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subjective cognitive complaints and neuropsychological test performance following military-related traumatic brain injury. French LM; Lange RT; Brickell T J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(6):933-50. PubMed ID: 25479042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance validity test and neuropsychological assessment battery screening module performances in an active-duty sample with a history of concussion. Grills CE; Armistead-Jehle P Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2016; 23(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 26943837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Virtual reality and the neuropsychological assessment of persons with neurologically based cognitive impairments. Buckwalter JG; Rizzo AA Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 39():17-21. PubMed ID: 10168914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Prospects of computer-assisted assessment of functional health status of military personnel]. Blaginin AA; Ganapolskii VP; Goncharenko AY; Emelyanov YA; Zhiltsova II; Sinelnikov SN; Yusupov VV Voen Med Zh; 2015 Aug; 336(8):46-50. PubMed ID: 26829870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]