These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23707891)

  • 1. Attentional changes in human perceptual learning.
    Angulo R; Alonso G
    Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():61-8. PubMed ID: 23707891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human perceptual learning: the effect of pre-exposure schedule depends on task demands.
    Angulo R; Alonso G
    Behav Processes; 2012 Nov; 91(3):244-52. PubMed ID: 23022603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention and relative novelty in human perceptual learning.
    Wang T; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):436-45. PubMed ID: 21500932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual learning with complex visual stimuli is based on location, rather than content, of discriminating features.
    Jones SP; Dwyer DM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):152-65. PubMed ID: 23421396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attention alters visual plasticity during exposure-based learning.
    Gutnisky DA; Hansen BJ; Iliescu BF; Dragoi V
    Curr Biol; 2009 Apr; 19(7):555-60. PubMed ID: 19268592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous presentation of similar stimuli produces perceptual learning in human picture processing.
    Mundy ME; Honey RC; Dwyer DM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Apr; 33(2):124-38. PubMed ID: 17469961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of exposure on discrimination of similar stimuli and on memory for their unique and common features.
    de Zilva D; Mitchell CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1123-38. PubMed ID: 22417278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of preexposure on stimulus discrimination: an investigation of the mechanisms responsible for human perceptual learning.
    Lavis Y; Mitchell C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Dec; 59(12):2083-101. PubMed ID: 17095489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of the role of associative inhibition in perceptual learning by means of the same-different task.
    Mitchell C; Kadib R; Nash S; Lavis Y; Hall G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Oct; 34(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 18954231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional control in learning to discriminate bars and gratings.
    Meinhardt G; Grabbe Y
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Feb; 142(4):539-50. PubMed ID: 11845249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictability of spatial and non-spatial target properties improves perception in the pre-saccadic interval.
    Born S; Ansorge U; Kerzel D
    Vision Res; 2013 Oct; 91():93-101. PubMed ID: 23954813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time course of visual attention across perceptual levels and objects.
    Srivastava P; Kumar D; Srinivasan N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 20937502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gaze-induced joint attention persists under high perceptual load and does not depend on awareness.
    Xu S; Zhang S; Geng H
    Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(18):2048-56. PubMed ID: 21840332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The intermixed-blocked effect in human perceptual learning is not the consequence of trial spacing.
    Mitchell C; Nash S; Hall G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):237-42. PubMed ID: 18194066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of stimulus comparison in perceptual learning: an investigation with the domestic chick.
    Honey RC; Bateson P; Horn G
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1994 Feb; 47(1):83-103. PubMed ID: 8165327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of stimulus comparison in animal perceptual learning: Effects of a distractor placement.
    Recio SA; Iliescu AF; de Brugada I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Dec; 71(12):2488-2496. PubMed ID: 29350108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional modulation of the mere exposure effect.
    Yagi Y; Ikoma S; Kikuchi T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1403-10. PubMed ID: 19857012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.