344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23707948)
1. Three-dimensional quantification of susceptibility artifacts from various metals in magnetic resonance images.
Imai H; Tanaka Y; Nomura N; Tsutsumi Y; Doi H; Kanno Z; Ohno K; Ono T; Hanawa T
Acta Biomater; 2013 Sep; 9(9):8433-9. PubMed ID: 23707948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the artifacts caused by metallic implants in breast MRI using dual-echo dixon versus conventional fat-suppression techniques.
Le Y; Kipfer HD; Majidi SS; Holz S; Lin C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W307-14. PubMed ID: 25148189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artifact reduction from metallic dental materials in T1-weighted spin-echo imaging at 3.0 tesla.
Zho SY; Kim MO; Lee KW; Kim DH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Feb; 37(2):471-8. PubMed ID: 22941956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying image distortion of orthopedic materials in magnetic resonance imaging.
Koff MF; Shah P; Koch KM; Potter HG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):610-8. PubMed ID: 23292702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) for reducing metallic artifacts in 3-T MRI.
Lee YH; Lim D; Kim E; Kim S; Song HT; Suh JS
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jun; 31(5):703-6. PubMed ID: 23290476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro assessment of needle artifacts with an interactive three-dimensional MR fluoroscopy system.
Thomas C; Springer F; Röthke M; Rempp H; Clasen S; Fritz J; Claussen CD; Pereira PL
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Mar; 21(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 20171560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying metal-induced susceptibility artifacts of the instrumented spine at 1.5T using fast-spin echo and 3D-multispectral MRI.
Kaushik SS; Karr R; Runquist M; Marszalkowski C; Sharma A; Rand SD; Maiman D; Koch KM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 27227824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bias artifact suppression on MR volumes.
Ardizzone E; Pirrone R; Gambino O
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):35-53. PubMed ID: 18644657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of magnetic susceptibility and volume on MRI artifacts produced by low magnetic susceptibility Zr-14Nb alloy and dental alloys.
Kajima Y; Takaichi A; Tsutsumi Y; Hanawa T; Wakabayashi N; Kawasaki A
Dent Mater J; 2020 Mar; 39(2):256-261. PubMed ID: 31723091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Artifacts from dental metal alloys in magnetic resonance imaging].
Cao Z; Chen LL; Gong XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(26):1855-8. PubMed ID: 19040024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.
Suh JS; Jeong EK; Shin KH; Cho JH; Na JB; Kim DH; Han CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1207-13. PubMed ID: 9798849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance compatibility of intraocular lenses measured at 7 Tesla.
van Rijn GA; Mourik JE; Teeuwisse WM; Luyten GP; Webb AG
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jun; 53(7):3449-53. PubMed ID: 22538424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging metallic artifact of commonly encountered surgical implants and foreign material.
Sutherland-Smith J; Tilley B
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 22277053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gliomas: correlation of magnetic susceptibility artifact with histologic grade.
Bagley LJ; Grossman RI; Judy KD; Curtis M; Loevner LA; Polansky M; Detre J
Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 9015082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction techniques.
Kolind SH; MacKay AL; Munk PL; Xiang QS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Sep; 20(3):487-95. PubMed ID: 15332257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by aneurysm clips and shunt valves: dependence on field strength (1.5 and 3 T) and imaging parameters.
Olsrud J; Lätt J; Brockstedt S; Romner B; Björkman-Burtscher IM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Sep; 22(3):433-7. PubMed ID: 16104008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imaging near metal with a MAVRIC-SEMAC hybrid.
Koch KM; Brau AC; Chen W; Gold GE; Hargreaves BA; Koff M; McKinnon GC; Potter HG; King KF
Magn Reson Med; 2011 Jan; 65(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 20981709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A multispectral three-dimensional acquisition technique for imaging near metal implants.
Koch KM; Lorbiecki JE; Hinks RS; King KF
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Feb; 61(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 19165901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interplay between intensity standardization and inhomogeneity correction in MR image processing.
Madabhushi A; Udupa JK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):561-76. PubMed ID: 15889544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
