These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23708422)

  • 1. Dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer performance in a developing world setting: intraocular pressure measurement acquisition and precision.
    Cheng J; Salam T; Russell PJ; Heath DG; Kotecha A
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):736-9. PubMed ID: 23708422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical use of a new position-independent rebound tonometer.
    Jablonski KS; Rosentreter A; Gaki S; Lappas A; Dietlein TS
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):763-7. PubMed ID: 23172572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Kaufmann C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3118-21. PubMed ID: 15326129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Hong J; Xu J; Wei A; Deng SX; Cui X; Yu X; Sun X
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):659-65. PubMed ID: 23307970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rebound, applanation, and dynamic contour tonometry in pathologic corneas.
    Rosentreter A; Athanasopoulos A; Schild AM; Lappas A; Cursiefen C; Dietlein TS
    Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 22673854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry before and after cataract surgery.
    Heinrich MA; Eppig T; Langenbucher A; Walter S; Behrens-Baumann W; Viestenz A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Apr; 38(4):683-9. PubMed ID: 22365580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Salim S; Du H; Wan J
    J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability and reproducibility for intraocular pressure measurement by dynamic contour, ocular response analyzer, and goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Dec; 18(9):666-73. PubMed ID: 20010245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.
    Tonnu PA; Ho T; Sharma K; White E; Bunce C; Garway-Heath D
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 89(7):847-50. PubMed ID: 15965164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can higher end tonometers be used interchangeably in routine clinical practice?
    Patel KJ; Jain SP; Kapadia PR; Patel NV; Patel S; Patel V
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 64(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 27050348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry After Vitrectomy.
    Mamas N; Fuest M; Koutsonas A; Roessler G; Mazinani BE; Walter P; Plange N
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Aug; 25(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 26950584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and noncontact tonometry in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Erdurmus M; Totan Y; Hepsen IF; Yagci R
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Mar; 23(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 18259205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Acute Atmospheric Pressure Changes on Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Normal Individuals: A Pilot Study.
    Albis-Donado O; Rodríguez-Camacho B; Bhartiya S; Ramírez-Neria P; López-Star E; González-Daher P; Badillo-Fernandez M; Stalmans I
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Sep; 29(9):756-760. PubMed ID: 32618804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry.
    Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer].
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Detry MB; Ledoux A; Pourjavan S
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2007 Mar; 30(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 17417152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma.
    Wachtl J; Töteberg-Harms M; Frimmel S; Roos M; Kniestedt C
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 135(6):601-608. PubMed ID: 28494071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.