These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23708943)
1. In vitro biomechanical testing of a micro external skeletal fixator. Deiss R; Bali MS; Doherr M; Spreng D; Rytz U; Ferguson SJ Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2013; 26(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 23708943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical comparison of three hybrid linear-circular external fixator constructs. Hudson CC; Lewis DD; Cross AR; Dunbar NJ; Horodyski M; Banks SA; Pozzi A Vet Surg; 2012 Nov; 41(8):954-65. PubMed ID: 22957475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A mechanical comparison of veterinary linear external fixation systems. White DT; Bronson DG; Welch RD Vet Surg; 2003; 32(6):507-14. PubMed ID: 14648528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro biomechanical testing of different configurations of acrylic external skeletal fixator constructs. Tyagi SK; Aithal HP; Kinjavdekar P; Amarpal ; Pawde AM; Srivastava T; Singh J; Madhu DN Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2015; 28(4):227-33. PubMed ID: 25998130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of in vitro mechanical properties of different designs of epoxy-pin external skeletal fixation systems. Tyagi SK; Aithal HP; Kinjavdekar P; Amarpal ; Pawde AM; Srivastava T; Tyagi KP; Monsang SW Vet Surg; 2014 Mar; 43(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 24410773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro biomechanical study of a multiplanar circular external fixator applied to equine third metacarpal bones. Cervantes C; Madison JB; Miller GJ; Casar RS Vet Surg; 1996; 25(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8719080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of various distal ring-block configurations on the biomechanical properties of circular external skeletal fixators for use in dogs and cats. Cross AR; Lewis DD; Rigaud S; Rapoff AJ Am J Vet Res; 2004 Apr; 65(4):393-8. PubMed ID: 15077678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a finite element model of the Kirschner-Ehmer external skeletal fixation system. Cross AR; Aron DN; Budsberg SC; Foutz TL; Pearman BT; Evans MD Am J Vet Res; 1999 May; 60(5):615-20. PubMed ID: 10328433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A biomechanical evaluation of three drop wire configurations. Arango J; Lewis DD; Hudson CC; Horodyski M Vet Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(6):669-77. PubMed ID: 23796078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stiffness of modified Type 1a linear external skeletal fixators. Reaugh HF; Rochat MC; Bruce CW; Galloway DS; Payton ME Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2007; 20(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 18038001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanics of Supplemental Drop Wire and Half-Pin Fixation Elements in Single Ring Circular External Fixator Constructs. Lewis RA; Lewis DD; Anderson CL; Hudson CC; Coggeshall JD; Iorgulescu AD; Banks SA Vet Surg; 2016 May; 45(4):471-9. PubMed ID: 27009685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical evaluation of various external skeletal fixator-intramedullary pin tie-in configurations using a tubular plastic bone model. Van Wettere AJ; Wallace LJ; Redig PT; Bourgeault CA; Bechtold JE J Avian Med Surg; 2009 Dec; 23(4):263-76. PubMed ID: 20235457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are circular external fixators weakened by the use of hemispheric washers? Marcellin-Little DJ; Roe SC; Rovesti GL; Bosio A; Ferretti A Vet Surg; 2002; 31(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 12094351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Axial characteristics of circular external skeletal fixator single ring constructs. Lewis DD; Bronson DG; Cross AR; Welch RD; Kubilis PS Vet Surg; 2001; 30(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 11443601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical evaluation of external skeletal fixator-intramedullary pin tie-in configurations applied to cadaveral humeri from red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis). Van Wettere AJ; Redig PT; Wallace LJ; Bourgeault CA; Bechtold JE J Avian Med Surg; 2009 Dec; 23(4):277-85. PubMed ID: 20235458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fixation stiffness of Dynafix unilateral external fixator in neutral and non-neutral configurations. Koo TK; Chao EY; Mak AF Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 16308459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A biomechanical comparison of external skeletal fixation and plating for the stabilization of ilial osteotomies in dogs. Fitzpatrick N; Lewis D; Cross A Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2008; 21(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 18704242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of strategies to adjust axial stiffness of a hybrid fixator. Socie MJ; Rovesti GL; Griffon DJ; Elkhatib O; Mudrock RN; Kurath P Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2012; 25(3):224-30. PubMed ID: 22451135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of strategies to increase external fixator stiffness: is double stacking worth the cost? Strebe S; Kim H; Russell JP; Hsieh AH; Nascone J; O'Toole RV Injury; 2014 Jul; 45(7):1049-53. PubMed ID: 24342369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. External fixation design evolution enhances biomechanical frame performance. Sellei RM; Kobbe P; Dadgar A; Pfeifer R; Behrens M; von Oldenburg G; Pape HC Injury; 2015 Sep; 46 Suppl 3():S23-6. PubMed ID: 26458295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]