These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23709188)

  • 1. Psychometric properties of the multiple mini-interview used for medical admissions: findings from generalizability and Rasch analyses.
    Sebok SS; Luu K; Klinger DA
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2014 Mar; 19(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 23709188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seeing Things Differently or Seeing Different Things? Exploring Raters' Associations of Noncognitive Attributes.
    Sebok SS; Syer MD
    Acad Med; 2015 Nov; 90(11 Suppl):S50-5. PubMed ID: 26505102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. First experience with multiple mini interview for medical school admission in Brazil: Does it work in a different cultural scenario?
    Daniel-Filho DA; Pires EMSG; Paes AT; Troster EJ; Silva SCABS; Granato MF; Couto TB; Barreto JKS; Campos AH; Monte JCM; Schvartsman C
    Med Teach; 2017 Oct; 39(10):1033-1039. PubMed ID: 28681649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of applicants to the veterinary curriculum using a multiple mini-interview method.
    Hecker K; Donnon T; Fuentealba C; Hall D; Illanes O; Morck DW; Muelling C
    J Vet Med Educ; 2009; 36(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 19625664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variance in attributes assessed by the multiple mini-interview.
    Zaidi NB; Swoboda C; Wang LL; Manuel RS
    Med Teach; 2014 Sep; 36(9):794-8. PubMed ID: 24820377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.
    Razack S; Faremo S; Drolet F; Snell L; Wiseman J; Pickering J
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 19769649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview.
    Lemay JF; Lockyer JM; Collin VT; Brownell AK
    Med Educ; 2007 Jun; 41(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 17518837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancing the reliability of the multiple mini-interview for selecting prospective health care leaders.
    Uijtdehaage S; Doyle L; Parker N
    Acad Med; 2011 Aug; 86(8):1032-9. PubMed ID: 21694560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-association between Neo-5 personality tests and multiple mini-interview.
    Kulasegaram K; Reiter HI; Wiesner W; Hackett RD; Norman GR
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 Aug; 15(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 20013153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple mini-interview test characteristics: 'tis better to ask candidates to recall than to imagine.
    Eva KW; Macala C
    Med Educ; 2014 Jun; 48(6):604-13. PubMed ID: 24807436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The multiple mini-interview: how long is long enough?
    Dodson M; Crotty B; Prideaux D; Carne R; Ward A; de Leeuw E
    Med Educ; 2009 Feb; 43(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 19161488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utility of a writing station in the multiple mini-interview.
    Raghavan M; Burnett M; Martin BD; Christensen H; Young DG; Mackalski B; Aoki F
    J Vet Med Educ; 2013; 40(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 23697543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving student selection using multiple mini-interviews with multifaceted Rasch modeling.
    Till H; Myford C; Dowell J
    Acad Med; 2013 Feb; 88(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 23269299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of Differential Weighting of Academics, Experiences, and Competencies Measured by Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) on Race and Ethnicity of Cohorts Accepted to One Medical School.
    Terregino CA; McConnell M; Reiter HI
    Acad Med; 2015 Dec; 90(12):1651-7. PubMed ID: 26488572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple mini-interview in selecting medical students.
    Roh H; Lee HJ; Park SB; Yang JH; Kim DJ; Kim SH; Lee SJ; Chae G
    Korean J Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 21(2):103-15. PubMed ID: 25813108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The utility of multiple mini-interviews: experience of a medical school.
    Kim KJ; Nam KS; Kwon BS
    Korean J Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 29(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 28264549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and acceptability of six station multiple mini-interviews: past-behavioural versus situational questions in postgraduate medical admission.
    Yamada T; Sato J; Yoshimura H; Okubo T; Hiraoka E; Shiga T; Kubota T; Fujitani S; Machi J; Ban N
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 28302124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing a new empathy-specific admissions test for applicants to medical schools: A discourse-pragmatic approach.
    Pounds G; Salter C; Platt MJ; Bryant P
    Commun Med; 2017; 14(2):165-180. PubMed ID: 29958359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees.
    Eva KW; Reiter HI; Trinh K; Wasi P; Rosenfeld J; Norman GR
    Med Educ; 2009 Aug; 43(8):767-75. PubMed ID: 19659490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should efforts in favor of medical student diversity be focused during admissions or farther upstream?
    Reiter HI; Lockyer J; Ziola B; Courneya CA; Eva K;
    Acad Med; 2012 Apr; 87(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 22361795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.