132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23709425)
1. Robotic mechanical localization of prostate cancer correlates with magnetic resonance imaging scans.
Shin TY; Kim YJ; Lim SK; Kim J; Rha KH
Yonsei Med J; 2013 Jul; 54(4):907-11. PubMed ID: 23709425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early localization of recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy by endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging.
Linder BJ; Kawashima A; Woodrum DA; Tollefson MK; Karnes J; Davis BJ; Rangel LJ; King BF; Mynderse LA
Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7283-9. PubMed ID: 24978358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.
Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Key Combined Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Concomitant Systematic Biopsies for the Prediction of Adverse Pathological Features in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Mattei A; Fiori C; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Moschini M; Zamboni S; Rakauskas A; Tian Z; Karakiewicz PI; De Cobelli F; Porpiglia F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2020 Jun; 77(6):733-741. PubMed ID: 31547938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology.
Wefer AE; Hricak H; Vigneron DB; Coakley FV; Lu Y; Wefer J; Mueller-Lisse U; Carroll PR; Kurhanewicz J
J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):400-4. PubMed ID: 10893595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Mowatt G; Scotland G; Boachie C; Cruickshank M; Ford JA; Fraser C; Kurban L; Lam TB; Padhani AR; Royle J; Scheenen TW; Tassie E
Health Technol Assess; 2013 May; 17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. PubMed ID: 23697373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging, guided prostate biopsy and digital rectal examination in the preoperative anatomical localization of prostate cancer.
Mullerad M; Hricak H; Kuroiwa K; Pucar D; Chen HN; Kattan MW; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2158-63. PubMed ID: 16280755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative prediction of neurovascular bundle involvement of localized prostate cancer by combined T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging of magnetic resonance imaging, number of positive biopsy cores, and Gleason score.
Naiki T; Okamura T; Nagata D; Mori Y; Kawai N; Ogawa K; Akita H; Hashimoto Y; Tozawa K; Kohri K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 21790224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic palpation-based mechanical property mapping for diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Ahn B; Lorenzo EI; Rha KH; Kim HJ; Kim J
J Endourol; 2011 May; 25(5):851-7. PubMed ID: 21492016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pathological and 3 Tesla Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation with Whole Mount Histopathology.
Tan N; Shen L; Khoshnoodi P; Alcalá HE; Yu W; Hsu W; Reiter RE; Lu DY; Raman SS
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1218-1223. PubMed ID: 29128577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsies in prostate tumor mapping.
Salomon L; Colombel M; Patard JJ; Lefrère-Belda MA; Bellot J; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Eur Urol; 1999 Apr; 35(4):289-93. PubMed ID: 10087390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.
Yoshizako T; Wada A; Hayashi T; Uchida K; Sumura M; Uchida N; Kitagaki H; Igawa M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 19031184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pre-biopsy 3-Tesla MRI and targeted biopsy of the index prostate cancer: correlation with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Patel U; Dasgupta P; Challacombe B; Cahill D; Brown C; Patel R; Kirby R
BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 27153933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined Whole Body and Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a 1-Step Approach to the Simultaneous Assessment of Local Recurrence and Metastatic Disease after Radical Prostatectomy.
Robertson NL; Sala E; Benz M; Landa J; Scardino P; Scher HI; Hricak H; Vargas HA
J Urol; 2017 Jul; 198(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 28216327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided transperineal target biopsy with needle tracking with a mechanical position-encoded stepper in detecting significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men.
Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Ogawa T; Kawakami M; Nakano M; Hashida K; Sato Y; Hasebe T; Uchida T; Tajiri T
Int J Urol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 28222486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy improves detection rates of prostate cancer in pre-biopsied patients].
Maxeiner A; Fischer T; Stephan C; Cash H; Slowinski T; Kilic E; Durmus T
Aktuelle Urol; 2014 May; 45(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24902069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.
Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.
Somford DM; Hamoen EH; Fütterer JJ; van Basten JP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Vreuls W; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Kiemeney LA; Barentsz JO; Witjes JA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1728-34. PubMed ID: 23680307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of magnetic resonance imaging in the decision to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles at robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Park BH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Jeon SS
J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 24440235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
