These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23709437)

  • 1. Conservative and surgical treatment improves pain and ankle-brachial index in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ohtori S; Yamashita M; Murata Y; Eguchi Y; Aoki Y; Ataka H; Hirayama J; Ozawa T; Morinaga T; Arai H; Mimura M; Kamoda H; Orita S; Miyagi M; Miyashita T; Okamoto Y; Ishikawa T; Sameda H; Kinoshita T; Hanaoka E; Suzuki M; Suzuki M; Aihara T; Ito T; Inoue G; Yamagata M; Toyone T; Kubota G; Sakuma Y; Oikawa Y; Inage K; Sainoh T; Yamauchi K; Takahashi K;
    Yonsei Med J; 2013 Jul; 54(4):999-1005. PubMed ID: 23709437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25840041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidence of nocturnal leg cramps in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis before and after conservative and surgical treatment.
    Ohtori S; Yamashita M; Murata Y; Eguchi Y; Aoki Y; Ataka H; Hirayama J; Ozawa T; Morinaga T; Arai H; Mimura M; Kamoda H; Orita S; Miyagi M; Miyashita T; Okamoto Y; Ishikawa T; Sameda H; Kinoshita T; Hanaoka E; Suzuki M; Suzuki M; Aihara T; Ito T; Inoue G; Yamagata M; Toyone T; Kubota G; Sakuma Y; Oikawa Y; Inage K; Sainoh T; Sato J; Yamauchi K; Takahashi K;
    Yonsei Med J; 2014 May; 55(3):779-84. PubMed ID: 24719148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study.
    Atlas SJ; Keller RB; Wu YA; Deyo RA; Singer DE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(8):936-43. PubMed ID: 15834339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Onken J; Franke J; Czabanka M; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical results of intrapedicular partial pediculectomy for lumbar foraminal stenosis.
    Ozeki N; Aota Y; Uesugi M; Kaneko K; Mihara H; Niimura T; Saito T
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jul; 21(5):324-7. PubMed ID: 18600141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spinal nerve root electroacupuncture for symptomatic treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis unresponsive to standard acupuncture: a prospective case series.
    Inoue M; Nakajima M; Hojo T; Kitakoji H; Itoi M
    Acupunct Med; 2012 Jun; 30(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 22534725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reversibility of nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis patients after decompression surgery.
    Barz C; Melloh M; Staub LP; Lord SJ; Merk HR; Barz T
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2573-2580. PubMed ID: 28161752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Difficulty of diagnosing the origin of lower leg pain in patients with both lumbar spinal stenosis and hip joint osteoarthritis.
    Saito J; Ohtori S; Kishida S; Nakamura J; Takeshita M; Shigemura T; Takazawa M; Eguchi Y; Inoue G; Orita S; Takaso M; Ochiai N; Kuniyoshi K; Aoki Y; Ishikawa T; Arai G; Miyagi M; Kamoda H; Suzuki M; Sakuma Y; Oikawa Y; Kubota G; Inage K; Sainoh T; Yamauchi K; Toyone T; Takahashi K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Dec; 37(25):2089-93. PubMed ID: 22588380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-Term Outcomes Following Lumbar Microendoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with and without Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
    Aihara T; Endo K; Suzuki H; Kojima A; Sawaji Y; Urushibara M; Matsuoka Y; Takamatsu T; Murata K; Konishi T; Yamauchi H; Endo H; Yamamoto K
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Feb; 146():e1219-e1225. PubMed ID: 33271376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis.
    Mekhail N; Vallejo R; Coleman MH; Benyamin RM
    Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 21676166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A predictive model for outcome after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Spratt KF; Keller TS; Szpalski M; Vandeputte K; Gunzburg R
    Eur Spine J; 2004 Feb; 13(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 14658061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bilateral spinal decompression of lumbar central stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar versus microsurgical laminotomy technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.
    Komp M; Hahn P; Oezdemir S; Giannakopoulos A; Heikenfeld R; Kasch R; Merk H; Godolias G; Ruetten S
    Pain Physician; 2015; 18(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 25675060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain.
    Crawford CH; Glassman SD; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 27285666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes after decompression surgery without fusion for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and substantial low back pain.
    Masuda S; Kanba Y; Kawai J; Ikeda N
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Jan; 29(1):147-152. PubMed ID: 31473813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Full Endoscopic Uniportal Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Highlight of Ligamentum Flavum Detachment and Survey of Efficacy and Safety in 2 Years of Follow-up.
    Huang YH; Lien FC; Chao LY; Lin CH; Chen SH
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e672-e681. PubMed ID: 31698129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing surgical levels by paraspinal mapping and diffusion tensor imaging techniques in lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Chen HB; Wan Q; Xu QF; Chen Y; Bai B
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Apr; 11(1):47. PubMed ID: 27113931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.
    Komatsu J; Muta T; Nagura N; Iwabuchi M; Fukuda H; Kaneko K; Shirado O
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782546. PubMed ID: 29938605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.