These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23710789)

  • 1. Single interrupted sutures compared with Donati sutures after open carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomised trial.
    Bolster M; Schipper C; Van Sterkenburg S; Ruettermann M; Reijnen M
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2013 Sep; 47(4):289-91. PubMed ID: 23710789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomised controlled study of two different techniques of skin suture in endoscopic release of carpal tunnel.
    Hansen TB; Kirkeby L; Fisker H; Larsen K
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2009; 43(6):335-8. PubMed ID: 19995253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery.
    Wade RG; Wormald JC; Figus A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Feb; 2(2):CD011757. PubMed ID: 29390170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double- versus single-incision technique for open carpal tunnel release.
    Hamed AR; Makki D; Chari R; Packer G
    Orthopedics; 2009 Oct; 32(10):. PubMed ID: 19824601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standard open decompression in carpal tunnel syndrome compared with a modified open technique preserving the superficial skin nerves: a prospective randomized study.
    Siegmeth AW; Hopkinson-Woolley JA
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Nov; 31(9):1483-9. PubMed ID: 17095378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial.
    Suwannaphisit S; Aonsong W; Suwanno P; Yuenyongviwat V
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Sep; 16(1):565. PubMed ID: 34535166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective randomized trial comparing absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in open carpal tunnel release.
    Kharwadkar N; Naique S; Molitor PJ
    J Hand Surg Br; 2005 Feb; 30(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 15620502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Five-year follow-up of carpal tunnel release in patients over age 65.
    Weber RA; DeSalvo DJ; Rude MJ
    J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Feb; 35(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 20060236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release using a new median nerve protector.
    Kwok TG; Huang CH; Kao HC
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Oct; 20(8):841-7. PubMed ID: 15483546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cosmetic results of lower midline abdominal incision: Donati stitches versus a continuous intracutaneous suture in a randomized clinical trial.
    de Waard J; Trimbos B; Peters L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(8):955-9. PubMed ID: 16862474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive carpal tunnel decompression using the KnifeLight.
    Hwang PY; Ho CL
    Neurosurgery; 2007 Feb; 60(2 Suppl 1):ONS162-8; discussion ONS168-9. PubMed ID: 17297379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of longitudinal open incision and two-incision techniques for carpal tunnel release.
    Castillo TN; Yao J
    J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 35(11):1813-9. PubMed ID: 21050965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: endoscopic or classical (open)? A prospective randomized trial].
    Hoefnagels WA; van Kleef JG; Mastenbroek GG; de Blok JA; Breukelman AJ; de Krom MC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1997 May; 141(18):878-82. PubMed ID: 9273452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The benefit of carpal tunnel release in patients with electrophysiologically moderate and severe disease.
    Kronlage SC; Menendez ME
    J Hand Surg Am; 2015 Mar; 40(3):438-44.e1. PubMed ID: 25708432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Carpal tunnel decompression: two different mini-incision techniques.
    Uçar BY; Demirtaş A; Bulut M; Azboy I; Uçar D
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2012 Apr; 16(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 22696883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carpal tunnel release. A prospective, randomised study of endoscopic versus limited-open methods.
    Wong KC; Hung LK; Ho PC; Wong JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2003 Aug; 85(6):863-8. PubMed ID: 12931807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pain and carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Duckworth AD; Jenkins PJ; Roddam P; Watts AC; Ring D; McEachan JE
    J Hand Surg Am; 2013 Aug; 38(8):1540-6. PubMed ID: 23890497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Re: Can the outcome of open carpal tunnel release be predicted? (ANZ J. Surg. 2010; 80: 50-4).
    Buntine JA
    ANZ J Surg; 2010; 80(7-8):568. PubMed ID: 20795980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Carpal tunnel decompression. Is lengthening of the flexor retinaculum better than simple division?
    Dias JJ; Bhowal B; Wildin CJ; Thompson JR
    J Hand Surg Br; 2004 Jun; 29(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 15142699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term follow up outcome results of Knifelight carpal tunnel release and conventional open release following a departmental randomized controlled trial. A prospective study.
    Elsharif M; Papanna M; Helm R
    Pol Orthop Traumatol; 2014 May; 79():67-70. PubMed ID: 24940704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.