These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23711893)

  • 1. A simple device prevents hysterotomy extensions during cesarean delivery for failed second stage of labor.
    Barrier BF; Allison JL; Andelin CO; Drobnis EZ
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 76(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 23711893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor.
    Sung JF; Daniels KI; Brodzinsky L; El-Sayed YY; Caughey AB; Lyell DJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):306.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17826431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adverse obstetric outcomes in women with previous cesarean for dystocia in second stage of labor.
    Jastrow N; Demers S; Gauthier RJ; Chaillet N; Brassard N; Bujold E
    Am J Perinatol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 22836821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cephalic Elevation Device for Second-Stage Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Lassey SC; Little SE; Saadeh M; Patton N; Farber MK; Bateman BT; Robinson JN
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 135(4):879-884. PubMed ID: 32168216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unintended hysterotomy extension during caesarean delivery: risk factors and maternal morbidity.
    Giugale LE; Sakamoto S; Yabes J; Dunn SL; Krans EE
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Nov; 38(8):1048-1053. PubMed ID: 29565193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of maternal outcomes from primary cesarean section during the second compared with first stage of labor by indication for the operation.
    Lurie S; Raz N; Boaz M; Sadan O; Golan A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():43-7. PubMed ID: 25218551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abdominal rescue after failed cephalic replacement.
    O'Leary JA; Cuva A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 80(3 Pt 2):514-6. PubMed ID: 1495726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical dilation at the time of cesarean section for dystocia -- effect on subsequent trial of labor.
    Abildgaard H; Ingerslev MD; Nickelsen C; Secher NJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Feb; 92(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 23025257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean?
    Merrer J; Dreyfus C; Girault A; Goffinet F; Le Ray C
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258049. PubMed ID: 34597319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Difficult delivery of the impacted fetal head during cesarean section: intraoperative disengagement dystocia.
    Blickstein I
    J Perinat Med; 2004; 32(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 15576265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk Factors and Maternal Morbidity Associated with Unintentional Hysterotomy Extension at the Time of Cesarean Delivery.
    Bligard KH; Durst JK; Stout MJ; Martin S; Cahill AG; Macones GA; Tuuli MG
    Am J Perinatol; 2019 Aug; 36(10):1054-1059. PubMed ID: 30500960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.
    Kjaergaard H; Olsen J; Ottesen B; Dykes AK
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 19330572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
    Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: impact of fetal size on trial of labor success for patients with previous cesarean for dystocia.
    Peaceman AM; Gersnoviez R; Landon MB; Spong CY; Leveno KJ; Varner MW; Rouse DJ; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Oct; 195(4):1127-31. PubMed ID: 17000245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome of trial of labor in patients with a single previous low transverse cesarean section for dystocia.
    Duff P; Southmayd K; Read JA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):380-4. PubMed ID: 3347423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns.
    Garite TJ; Dildy GA; McNamara H; Nageotte MP; Boehm FH; Dellinger EH; Knuppel RA; Porreco RP; Miller HS; Sunderji S; Varner MW; Swedlow DB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1049-58. PubMed ID: 11084540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variations in cesarean delivery for fetal distress.
    Hueston WJ; McClaflin RR; Claire E
    J Fam Pract; 1996 Nov; 43(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 8917145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can angle of progression in pregnant women before onset of labor predict mode of delivery?
    Levy R; Zaks S; Ben-Arie A; Perlman S; Hagay Z; Vaisbuch E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 22605649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cesarean delivery during second-stage labor: characteristics and diagnostic accuracy.
    Garrett K; Butler A; Cohen WR
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Jan; 17(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 15804787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.