217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23712578)
1. Three-year results from a randomised trial of a retropubic mid-urethral sling versus the Miniarc single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence.
Basu M; Duckett J
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2059-64. PubMed ID: 23712578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT.
Abdel-Fattah M; Cooper D; Davidson T; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Bhal K; McDonald A; Wardle J; N'Dow J; MacLennan G; Norrie J
Health Technol Assess; 2022 Dec; 26(47):1-190. PubMed ID: 36520097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
Nambiar A; Cody JD; Jeffery ST; Aluko P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD008709. PubMed ID: 28746980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
Nambiar A; Cody JD; Jeffery ST
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; (6):CD008709. PubMed ID: 24880654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
Saraswat L; Rehman H; Omar MI; Cody JD; Aluko P; Glazener CM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jan; 1(1):CD001754. PubMed ID: 31990055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.
Ford AA; Rogerson L; Cody JD; Ogah J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; (7):CD006375. PubMed ID: 26130017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cohort study comparing a single-incision sling with a retropubic midurethral sling.
Madsen AM; El-Nashar SA; Woelk JL; Klingele CJ; Gebhart JB; Trabuco EC
Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Mar; 25(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 24043128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: the ESTER systematic review and economic evaluation.
Brazzelli M; Javanbakht M; Imamura M; Hudson J; Moloney E; Becker F; Wallace S; Omar MI; Shimonovich M; MacLennan G; Ternent L; Vale L; Montgomery I; Mackie P; Saraswat L; Monga A; Craig D
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Mar; 23(14):1-306. PubMed ID: 30929658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retropubic or transobturator mid-urethral slings for intrinsic sphincter deficiency-related stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ford AA; Ogah JA
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 26220506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.
Dogan O; Kaya AE; Pulatoglu C; Basbug A; Yassa M
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1387-1395. PubMed ID: 29549394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Re: three-year results from a randomised trial of a retropubic mid-urethral sling versus the miniarc single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence.
Wein AJ
J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):157-8. PubMed ID: 25625163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of retropubic synthetic mid-urethral slings to fascia pubovaginal slings following failed sling surgery.
Aberger M; Gomelsky A; Padmanabhan P
Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Sep; 35(7):851-4. PubMed ID: 26175333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeat mid-urethral sling for recurrent female stress urinary incontinence.
Meyer F; Hermieu JF; Boyd A; Dominique S; Peyrat L; Haab F; Ravery V
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 May; 24(5):817-22. PubMed ID: 22976532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes following repeat mid urethral synthetic sling after failure of the initial sling procedure: rediscovery of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure.
Lee KS; Doo CK; Han DH; Jung BJ; Han JY; Choo MS
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1370-4; discussion 1374. PubMed ID: 17706716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.
Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; de Ridder DJ; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 25168619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following surgical anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs Miniarc).
Lo TS; Tan YL; Wu PY; Cortes EF; Pue LB; Al-Kharabsheh A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():91-7. PubMed ID: 25265496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomised comparison of single-incision versus traditional transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of a 24-month follow-up.
Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jun; 27(6):871-7. PubMed ID: 26670576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adjustable mini-sling compared with conventional mid-urethral slings in women with urinary incontinence: a 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
Alexandridis V; Rudnicki M; Jakobsson U; Teleman P
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1465-1473. PubMed ID: 31222572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
Lapitan MC; Cody JD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 2():CD002912. PubMed ID: 26878400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 5-year longitudinal followup after retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings.
Kenton K; Stoddard AM; Zyczynski H; Albo M; Rickey L; Norton P; Wai C; Kraus SR; Sirls LT; Kusek JW; Litman HJ; Chang RP; Richter HE
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 25158274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
