These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2371299)

  • 1. Strategies for the identification of rodent carcinogens by in vitro short-term tests.
    Zeiger E
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340D():261-71. PubMed ID: 2371299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting rodent carcinogenicity using potency measures of the in vitro sister chromatid exchange and chromosome aberration assays.
    Schildcrout JS; Margolin BH; Zeiger E
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 33(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 10037324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):499-536. PubMed ID: 10353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity utilizing a battery of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests.
    Kim BS; Margolin BH
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 34(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 10618179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mutagenesis, clastogenesis, carcinogenesis: expectations, correlations and relations.
    Zeiger E; Tennant RW
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1986; 209B():75-84. PubMed ID: 3529117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Mutagenicity, genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of ZM anion brown dye].
    Kulagina TF; Vasil'eva LA; Pylev LN; Grankina EP; Gurski T; Gurska E; Sikora M; Guretska D
    Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1990; (3):26-8. PubMed ID: 2351283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental carcinogenicity and mutagenicity of non-asbestos natural fibres--preliminary report.
    Woźniak H; Wiecek E; Stetkiewicz J; Wyszyńska K
    Pol J Occup Med Environ Health; 1993; 6(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 8219898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of rodent carcinogens and noncarcinogens using genetic toxicity tests: premises, promises, and performance.
    Zeiger E
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Oct; 28(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 9927558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the bioluminescence assays as screens for genotoxic chemicals.
    Elmore E; Fitzgerald MP
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340D():379-87. PubMed ID: 2371306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carcinogenicity of medicinal drugs: a survey of IARC monographs.
    Török G; Csík M; Pintér A; Surján A
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 2000 Jul; 8 Suppl():83-5. PubMed ID: 10943485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of p-nitrotoluene (CAS no. 99-99-0) in F344/N rats and B6C3F(1) mice (feed studies).
    National Toxicology Program
    Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 2002 May; (498):1-277. PubMed ID: 12118261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between rodent carcinogenicity test results of 44 chemicals and a number of predictive systems.
    Lewis DF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Dec; 20(3 Pt 1):215-22. PubMed ID: 7724831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medium-term bioassays in rats for rapid detection of the carcinogenic potential of chemicals.
    Shirai T; Hirose M; Ito N
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):251-72. PubMed ID: 10353390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Epidemiological and experimental applications to occupational cancer prevention.
    Vainio H; Hemminki K
    J UOEH; 1989 Mar; 11 Suppl():323-45. PubMed ID: 2664947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A bootstrap analysis of four in vitro short-term test performances.
    Benigni R
    Mutat Res; 1989 Apr; 216(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 2927414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NTP technical report on toxicity studies of t-butyl alcohol (CAS No. 75-65-0). Administered by inhalation to F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice.
    Mahler J
    Toxic Rep Ser; 1997 Jul; (53):1-56, A1-D9. PubMed ID: 11803704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of short-term tests for carcinogenicity.
    Lave LB; Omenn GS
    Nature; 1986 Nov 6-12; 324(6092):29-34. PubMed ID: 3097548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.