These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2371301)

  • 1. The assembly and analysis of short-term genotoxicity test data--an ICPEMC Committee 1 Working Paper.
    Lohman PH; Mendelsohn ML; Moore DH; Waters MD; Brusick DJ
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340D():283-94. PubMed ID: 2371301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.
    Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E;
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which rules for assembling short-term test batteries to predict carcinogenicity?
    Benigni R; Giuliani A
    Mol Toxicol; 1987; 1(2-3):143-66. PubMed ID: 3449755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A computer-assisted procedure for the assembly and analysis of short-term genotoxicity test data.
    Brusick D
    Toxicol Lett; 1989 Dec; 49(2-3):123-38. PubMed ID: 2603167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regulatory aspects of genotoxicity testing: from hazard identification to risk assessment.
    Blakey D; Galloway SM; Kirkland DJ; MacGregor JT
    Mutat Res; 2008 Nov; 657(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 18926925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling the Ames Salmonella/microsome assay.
    Krewski D; Leroux BG; Bleuer SR; Broekhoven LH
    Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):499-510. PubMed ID: 8369384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strategy for genotoxicity testing--metabolic considerations.
    Ku WW; Bigger A; Brambilla G; Glatt H; Gocke E; Guzzie PJ; Hakura A; Honma M; Martus HJ; Obach RS; Roberts S;
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 17141553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A proposed method for assembly and interpretation of short-term test data.
    Brusick D
    Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Dec; 96():101-11. PubMed ID: 1820250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term assays to predict carcinogenicity. Statistical analysis of data from in-vitro assays of mutagenesis.
    Breslow N; Kaldor J
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (83):457-81. PubMed ID: 3305350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. A method for combining and comparing short-term genotoxicity test data: preface. A report from ICPEMC Committee 1.
    Brusick DJ; Ashby J; de Serres FJ; Lohman PH; Matsushima T; Matter BE; Mendelsohn ML; Moore DH; Nesnow S; Waters MD
    Mutat Res; 1992 Mar; 266(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 1372961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.
    Kirkland DJ; Henderson L; Marzin D; Müller L; Parry JM; Speit G; Tweats DJ; Williams GM
    Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpretation of short-term test data: implications for assessment of chemopreventive activity.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA; Brockman HE
    IARC Sci Publ; 1996; (139):313-32. PubMed ID: 8923041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommendations for screening for potential human germ cell mutagens: an ICPEMC Working Paper.
    Bridges BA; Mendelsohn ML
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1986; 209B():51-65. PubMed ID: 3749105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. VITOTOX bacterial genotoxicity and toxicity test for the rapid screening of chemicals.
    Verschaeve L; Van Gompel J; Thilemans L; Regniers L; Vanparys P; van der Lelie D
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 33(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 10334626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro approaches to develop weight of evidence (WoE) and mode of action (MoA) discussions with positive in vitro genotoxicity results.
    Kirkland DJ; Aardema M; Banduhn N; Carmichael P; Fautz R; Meunier JR; Pfuhler S
    Mutagenesis; 2007 May; 22(3):161-75. PubMed ID: 17369606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short-term tests, genotoxicity and carcinogenicity in light of a multivariate statistical exploration.
    Benigni R
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1989; 25(4):573-5. PubMed ID: 2631623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical analysis of in vitro data for risk assessment - exemplified for a case of Ames test data.
    Roller M; Aufderheide M
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 60(2-3):213-24. PubMed ID: 18396021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Genotoxicity resulting from a complex mixture of environmental origin using 2 bacterial systems].
    López L; Moretton J
    Rev Argent Microbiol; 1996; 28(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 8815455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Problems of extrapolation from experimental data to human mutagenesis.
    Lyon MF
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1982; 109():127-36. PubMed ID: 7167538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.