These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

683 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23713198)

  • 1. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial references and audio-tactile interaction in cross-modal dynamic capture.
    Chen L; Wang Q; Bao M
    Multisens Res; 2014; 27(1):55-70. PubMed ID: 25102666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Congruency effects between auditory and tactile motion: extending the phenomenon of cross-modal dynamic capture.
    Soto-Faraco S; Spence C; Kingstone A
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 4(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 15460927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the effect of visual and tactile distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion.
    Sanabria D; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):548-58. PubMed ID: 16132965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Capture of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion by moving and static sound.
    Chen L; Zhou X
    Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(4):369-89. PubMed ID: 21864460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Event-related potential evidence for a dynamic (re-)weighting of somatotopic and external coordinates of touch during visual-tactile interactions.
    Ley P; Steinberg U; Hanganu-Opatz IL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 May; 41(11):1466-74. PubMed ID: 25879770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task-irrelevant sounds influence both temporal order and apparent-motion judgments about tactile stimuli applied to crossed and uncrossed hands.
    Badde S; Röder B; Bruns P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):773-783. PubMed ID: 29282652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interaction of perceptual grouping and crossmodal temporal capture in tactile apparent-motion.
    Chen L; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e17130. PubMed ID: 21383834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task.
    Holmes NP; Sanabria D; Calvert GA; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1077(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 16483553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-modal links in endogenous spatial attention are mediated by common external locations: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Eimer M; Cockburn D; Smedley B; Driver J
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Aug; 139(4):398-411. PubMed ID: 11534863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The modulation of crossmodal integration by unimodal perceptual grouping: a visuotactile apparent motion study.
    Lyons G; Sanabria D; Vatakis A; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 174(3):510-6. PubMed ID: 16721609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial remapping in the audio-tactile ventriloquism effect: a TMS investigation on the role of the ventral intraparietal area.
    Renzi C; Bruns P; Heise KF; Zimerman M; Feldheim JF; Hummel FC; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 May; 25(5):790-801. PubMed ID: 23363411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relative contributions of visual and auditory spatial representations to tactile localization.
    Noel JP; Wallace M
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Feb; 82():84-90. PubMed ID: 26768124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual, auditory and tactile stimuli compete for early sensory processing capacities within but not between senses.
    Porcu E; Keitel C; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 97():224-35. PubMed ID: 24736186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expected but omitted stimuli affect crossmodal interaction.
    Costantini M; Migliorati D; Donno B; Sirota M; Ferri F
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():52-64. PubMed ID: 29107888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory and tactile signals combine to influence vision during binocular rivalry.
    Lunghi C; Morrone MC; Alais D
    J Neurosci; 2014 Jan; 34(3):784-92. PubMed ID: 24431437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of sound intensity on the audiotactile crossmodal dynamic capture effect.
    Occelli V; Spence C; Zampini M
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 193(3):409-19. PubMed ID: 19011842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual motion interferes with tactile motion perception.
    Craig JC
    Perception; 2006; 35(3):351-67. PubMed ID: 16619951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of attention on the illusory capture of motion in bimodal stimuli.
    Oruc I; Sinnett S; Bischof WF; Soto-Faraco S; Lock K; Kingstone A
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():200-8. PubMed ID: 18514172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influences of intra- and crossmodal grouping on visual and tactile Ternus apparent motion.
    Chen L; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():152-62. PubMed ID: 20659437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.