These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23713707)

  • 1. The doubtful environmental benefit of reduced maximum sulfur limit in international shipping fuel.
    Mestl T; Løvoll G; Stensrud E; Le Breton A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jun; 47(12):6098-101. PubMed ID: 23713707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Demonstration of fuel switching on oceangoing vessels in the Gulf of Mexico.
    Browning L; Hartley S; Bandemehr A; Gathright K; Miller W
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Sep; 62(9):1093-101. PubMed ID: 23019823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diverse changes in shipping emissions around the Western Pacific ports under the coeffect of the epidemic and fuel oil policy.
    Yuan Y; Zhang Y; Mao J; Yu G; Xu K; Zhao J; Qian H; Wu L; Yang X; Chen Y; Ma W
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jun; 879():162892. PubMed ID: 36934943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Climate impact of biofuels in shipping: global model studies of the aerosol indirect effect.
    Righi M; Klinger C; Eyring V; Hendricks J; Lauer A; Petzold A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(8):3519-25. PubMed ID: 21428387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterizations and comparison of low sulfur fuel oils compliant with 2020 global sulfur cap regulation for international shipping.
    Nelson RK; Scarlett AG; Gagnon MM; Holman AI; Reddy CM; Sutton PA; Grice K
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2022 Jul; 180():113791. PubMed ID: 35665617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mitigating the health impacts of pollution from oceangoing shipping: an assessment of low-sulfur fuel mandates.
    Winebrake JJ; Corbett JJ; Green EH; Lauer A; Eyring V
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jul; 43(13):4776-82. PubMed ID: 19673264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shipping Remains a Globally Significant Source of Anthropogenic PN Emissions Even after 2020 Sulfur Regulation.
    Kuittinen N; Jalkanen JP; Alanen J; Ntziachristos L; Hannuniemi H; Johansson L; Karjalainen P; Saukko E; Isotalo M; Aakko-Saksa P; Lehtoranta K; Keskinen J; Simonen P; Saarikoski S; Asmi E; Laurila T; Hillamo R; Mylläri F; Lihavainen H; Timonen H; Rönkkö T
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 55(1):129-138. PubMed ID: 33290058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bionics and green technology in maritime shipping: an assessment of the effect of Salvinia air-layer hull coatings for drag and fuel reduction.
    Busch J; Barthlott W; Brede M; Terlau W; Mail M
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2019 Feb; 377(2138):20180263. PubMed ID: 30967069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From maritime salvage to IMO 2020 strategy: Two actions to protect the environment.
    Sáez Álvarez P
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2021 Sep; 170():112590. PubMed ID: 34171628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of reducing sulfur emissions from ships.
    Wang C; Corbett JJ; Winebrake JJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Dec; 41(24):8233-9. PubMed ID: 18200845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefits of two mitigation strategies for container vessels: cleaner engines and cleaner fuels.
    Khan MY; Giordano M; Gutierrez J; Welch WA; Asa-Awuku A; Miller JW; Cocker DR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 May; 46(9):5049-56. PubMed ID: 22468877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The variation of PM
    Zhang X; Aikawa M
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Feb; 858(Pt 2):159968. PubMed ID: 36347285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of fuel quality regulation and speed reductions on shipping emissions: implications for climate and air quality.
    Lack DA; Cappa CD; Langridge J; Bahreini R; Buffaloe G; Brock C; Cerully K; Coffman D; Hayden K; Holloway J; Lerner B; Massoli P; Li SM; McLaren R; Middlebrook AM; Moore R; Nenes A; Nuaaman I; Onasch TB; Peischl J; Perring A; Quinn PK; Ryerson T; Schwartz JP; Spackman R; Wofsy SC; Worsnop D; Xiang B; Williams E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(20):9052-60. PubMed ID: 21910443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short and long-term effects of low-sulphur fuels on marine zooplankton communities.
    Jönander C; Dahllöf I
    Aquat Toxicol; 2020 Oct; 227():105592. PubMed ID: 32891020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Costs and benefits of low-sulphur fuel standard for Baltic Sea shipping.
    Antturi J; Hänninen O; Jalkanen JP; Johansson L; Prank M; Sofiev M; Ollikainen M
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 2):431-440. PubMed ID: 27742151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental policy constraints for acidic exhaust gas scrubber discharges from ships.
    Ülpre H; Eames I
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2014 Nov; 88(1-2):292-301. PubMed ID: 25284442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between the development of global maritime fleets and GHG emission from shipping.
    Chen J; Fei Y; Wan Z
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Jul; 242():31-39. PubMed ID: 31026800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Onboard measurements of nanoparticles from a SCR-equipped marine diesel engine.
    Hallquist ÅM; Fridell E; Westerlund J; Hallquist M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(2):773-80. PubMed ID: 23163334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating shipping emissions in the region of the Sea of Marmara, Turkey.
    Deniz C; Durmuşoğlu Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Feb; 390(1):255-61. PubMed ID: 17976688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In-depth analysis of accidental oil spills from tankers in the context of global spill trends from all sources.
    Burgherr P
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Feb; 140(1-2):245-56. PubMed ID: 16942835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.