These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23713707)

  • 21. The roles of scientific research and stakeholder engagement for evidence-based policy formulation on shipping emissions control in Hong Kong.
    Zhang Y; Loh C; Louie PKK; Liu H; Lau AKH
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 223():49-56. PubMed ID: 29890455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of the 1990 Hong Kong legislation for restriction on sulfur content in fuel.
    Wong CM; Rabl A; Thach TQ; Chau YK; Chan KP; Cowling BJ; Lai HK; Lam TH; McGhee SM; Anderson HR; Hedley AJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Aug; (170):5-91. PubMed ID: 23316618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Container fleet renewal considering multiple sulfur reduction technologies and uncertain markets amidst COVID-19.
    Zhao Y; Ye J; Zhou J
    J Clean Prod; 2021 Oct; 317():128361. PubMed ID: 34511741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Present-day and future global bottom-up ship emission inventories including polar routes.
    Paxian A; Eyring V; Beer W; Sausen R; Wright C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Feb; 44(4):1333-9. PubMed ID: 20088494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Operation of marine diesel engines on biogenic fuels: modification of emissions and resulting climate effects.
    Petzold A; Lauer P; Fritsche U; Hasselbach J; Lichtenstern M; Schlager H; Fleischer F
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(24):10394-400. PubMed ID: 22044020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Public health, climate, and economic impacts of desulfurizing jet fuel.
    Barrett SR; Yim SH; Gilmore CK; Murray LT; Kuhn SR; Tai AP; Yantosca RM; Byun DW; Ngan F; Li X; Levy JI; Ashok A; Koo J; Wong HM; Dessens O; Balasubramanian S; Fleming GG; Pearlson MN; Wollersheim C; Malina R; Arunachalam S; Binkowski FS; Leibensperger EM; Jacob DJ; Hileman JI; Waitz IA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Apr; 46(8):4275-82. PubMed ID: 22380547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spill accident modeling: a critical survey of the event-decision network in the context of IMO's formal safety assessment.
    Ventikos NP; Psaraftis HN
    J Hazard Mater; 2004 Feb; 107(1-2):59-66. PubMed ID: 15036643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of seawater scrubbing on a microplanktonic community during a summer-bloom in the Baltic Sea.
    Ytreberg E; Karlberg M; Hassellöv IM; Hedblom M; Nylund AT; Salo K; Imberg H; Turner D; Tripp L; Yong J; Wulff A
    Environ Pollut; 2021 Dec; 291():118251. PubMed ID: 34592329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The contribution from shipping emissions to air quality and acid deposition in Europe.
    Derwent RG; Stevenson DS; Doherty RM; Collins WJ; Sanderson MG; Johnson CE; Cofala J; Mechler R; Amann M; Dentener FJ
    Ambio; 2005 Feb; 34(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 15789519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. EC proposes sulfur limits on marine fuels.
    Burke M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Feb; 37(3):54A. PubMed ID: 12630451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact assessment of a mandatory operational goal-based short-term measure to reduce GHG emissions from ships: the LDC/SIDS case study.
    Psaraftis HN; Zis T
    Int Environ Agreem; 2021; 21(3):445-467. PubMed ID: 33424522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Global Shipping Emissions from a Well-to-Wake Perspective: The MariTEAM Model.
    Kramel D; Muri H; Kim Y; Lonka R; Nielsen JB; Ringvold AL; Bouman EA; Steen S; Strømman AH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Nov; 55(22):15040-15050. PubMed ID: 34705455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The European and International legal framework on monitoring and response to oil pollution from ships.
    Ferraro G; Pavliha M
    J Environ Monit; 2010 Mar; 12(3):574-80. PubMed ID: 20445844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Advanced operational measure for reducing fuel consumption onboard ships.
    Elkafas AG
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Dec; 29(60):90509-90519. PubMed ID: 35870069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Life cycle comparison of marine fuels for IMO 2020 Sulphur Cap.
    Bilgili L
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 774():145719. PubMed ID: 33609833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Life cycle assessment of ship-generated waste management of Luka Koper.
    Zuin S; Belac E; Marzi B
    Waste Manag; 2009 Dec; 29(12):3036-46. PubMed ID: 19643592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Harnessing wind energy on merchant ships: case study Flettner rotors onboard bulk carriers.
    Seddiek IS; Ammar NR
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(25):32695-707. PubMed ID: 33630258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Experimental study on particulate and NOx emissions of a diesel engine fueled with ultra low sulfur diesel, RME-diesel blends and PME-diesel blends.
    Zhu L; Zhang W; Liu W; Huang Z
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Feb; 408(5):1050-8. PubMed ID: 19913283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the risk of ships striking large whales in marine spatial planning.
    Redfern JV; McKenna MF; Moore TJ; Calambokidis J; Deangelis ML; Becker EA; Barlow J; Forney KA; Fiedler PC; Chivers SJ
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):292-302. PubMed ID: 23521668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ship Compliance in Emission Control Areas: Technology Costs and Policy Instruments.
    Carr EW; Corbett JJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 49(16):9584-91. PubMed ID: 26258438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.