158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23713784)
41. The production effect in recognition memory: Weakening strength can strengthen distinctiveness.
Bodner GE; Jamieson RK; Cormack DT; McDonald DL; Bernstein DM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 27244351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Production improves recognition and reduces intrusions in between-subject designs: An updated meta-analysis.
Fawcett JM; Baldwin MM; Whitridge JW; Swab M; Malayang K; Hiscock B; Drakes DH; Willoughby HV
Can J Exp Psychol; 2023 Mar; 77(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 36521123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Assessing the costs and benefits of production in recognition.
Bodner GE; Taikh A; Fawcett JM
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 23884689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Reading aloud: spelling-sound translation uses central attention.
O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Stolz JA; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 18315417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Distinctive encodings and the production effect: failure to retrieve distinctive encodings decreases recollection of silent items.
Ozubko JD; Bamburoski LD; Carlin K; Fawcett JM
Memory; 2020 Feb; 28(2):237-260. PubMed ID: 31959064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. I said, you said: the production effect gets personal.
MacLeod CM
Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Dec; 18(6):1197-202. PubMed ID: 21938642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Production as a distinctive contextual cue for retrieving intentionally forgotten information.
Zhou Y; MacLeod CM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Sep; 76(3):226-233. PubMed ID: 35549360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Widening the boundaries of the production effect.
Forrin ND; Macleod CM; Ozubko JD
Mem Cognit; 2012 Oct; 40(7):1046-55. PubMed ID: 22528825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Confusion between silent and overt reading in schizophrenia.
Franck N; Rouby P; Daprati E; Daléry J; Marie-Cardine M; Georgieff N
Schizophr Res; 2000 Jan; 41(2):357-64. PubMed ID: 10708345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Metacognition and false recognition in patients with frontal lobe lesions: the distinctiveness heuristic.
Budson AE; Dodson CS; Vatner JM; Daffner KR; Black PM; Schacter DL
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):860-71. PubMed ID: 15716158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Recognition memory for studied words is determined by cortical activation differences at encoding but not during retrieval.
Chee MW; Goh JO; Lim Y; Graham S; Lee K
Neuroimage; 2004 Aug; 22(4):1456-65. PubMed ID: 15275903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. How well imageability, concreteness, perceptual strength, and action strength predict recognition memory, lexical decision, and reading aloud performance.
Khanna MM; Cortese MJ
Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):622-636. PubMed ID: 33971794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The production effect: costs and benefits in free recall.
Jones AC; Pyc MA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):300-5. PubMed ID: 23751006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Episodic memory reflected in printed word naming.
Goldinger SD; Azuma T
Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Aug; 11(4):716-22. PubMed ID: 15581123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Thinking outside the box when reading aloud: Between (localist) module connection strength as a source of word frequency effects.
Besner D; Risko EF
Psychol Rev; 2016 Oct; 123(5):592-9. PubMed ID: 27657439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
Rhodes MG; Castel AD
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. On the strength of connections between localist mental modules as a source of frequency-of-occurrence effects.
Besner D; Moroz S; O'Malley S
Psychol Sci; 2011 Mar; 22(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 21285440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Production benefits learning: the production effect endures and improves memory for text.
Ozubko JD; Hourihan KL; MacLeod CM
Memory; 2012; 20(7):717-27. PubMed ID: 22827717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The relationship between knowing a word and reading it aloud in children's word reading development.
Nation K; Cocksey J
J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Jul; 103(3):296-308. PubMed ID: 19410262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Listening to the Picture-Superiority Effect.
Ensor TM; Bancroft TD; Hockley WE
Exp Psychol; 2019 Mar; 66(2):134-153. PubMed ID: 30895914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
