These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Exploring the psychological structure of transformational knowledge in visual and haptic intramodal conditions using multidimensional scaling. Do PT; Homa D Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Oct; 115(2):443-64. PubMed ID: 23265010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can patients with Alzheimer's disease learn a category implicitly? Bozoki A; Grossman M; Smith EE Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(5):816-27. PubMed ID: 16229868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning. Smith JD; Minda JP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):800-11. PubMed ID: 12109770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bogus concerns about the false prototype enhancement effect. Homa D; Hout MC; Milliken L; Milliken AM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):368-77. PubMed ID: 21261424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hebb repetition effects in visual memory: the roles of verbal rehearsal and distinctiveness. Horton N; Hay DC; Smyth MM Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008; 61(12):1769-77. PubMed ID: 18609390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prototype-distortion category learning: a two-phase learning process across a distributed network. Little DM; Thulborn KR Brain Cogn; 2006 Apr; 60(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 16406637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A high-distortion enhancement effect in the prototype-learning paradigm: dramatic effects of category learning during test. Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):2088-96. PubMed ID: 18265623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automaticity of basic-level categorization accounts for labeling effects in visual recognition memory. Richler JJ; Gauthier I; Palmeri TJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1579-87. PubMed ID: 21767063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images. Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The enhancement of cortical excitability over the DLPFC before and during training impairs categorization in the prototype distortion task. Ambrus GG; Zimmer M; Kincses ZT; Harza I; Kovács G; Paulus W; Antal A Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1974-80. PubMed ID: 21440562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Smith JD; Redford JS; Haas SM J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):390-401. PubMed ID: 18473665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Information-integration category learning in patients with striatal dysfunction. Filoteo JV; Maddox WT; Salmon DP; Song DD Neuropsychology; 2005 Mar; 19(2):212-22. PubMed ID: 15769205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prototypical category learning in high-functioning autism. Vladusich T; Olu-Lafe O; Kim DS; Tager-Flusberg H; Grossberg S Autism Res; 2010 Oct; 3(5):226-36. PubMed ID: 20717947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transformation of task components into an integrated representation during task switching. Kleinsorge T; Gajewski PD Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):334-45. PubMed ID: 17055442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Developmental differences in the use of prototype and exemplar-specific information. Hayes BK; Taplin JE J Exp Child Psychol; 1993 Jun; 55(3):329-52. PubMed ID: 8315374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]