These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23714302)

  • 1. Are systematic reviews up-to-date at the time of publication?
    Beller EM; Chen JK; Wang UL; Glasziou PP
    Syst Rev; 2013 May; 2():36. PubMed ID: 23714302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the information of systematic reviews published in nursing journals up-to-date? a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WWS; Lo KKH; Khalechelvam P; Seah J; Goh SYS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):151. PubMed ID: 29178832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of information sources used in Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews: A case study in the field of anesthesiology and pain.
    Biocic M; Fidahic M; Cikes K; Puljak L
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):597-605. PubMed ID: 31393677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Up-to-dateness of reviews is often neglected in overviews: a systematic review.
    Pieper D; Antoine SL; Neugebauer EA; Eikermann M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Dec; 67(12):1302-8. PubMed ID: 25281222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster.
    Sampson M; Shojania KG; Garritty C; Horsley T; Ocampo M; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):531-6. PubMed ID: 18471656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deficiencies in the publication and reporting of the results of systematic reviews presented at scientific medical conferences.
    Hopewell S; Boutron I; Altman DG; Ravaud P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1488-95. PubMed ID: 25890806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts.
    Scherer RW; Langenberg P; von Elm E
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):MR000005. PubMed ID: 17443628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochrane systematic reviews and co-publication: dissemination of evidence on interventions for ophthalmic conditions.
    Wang X; Hawkins BS; Dickersin K
    Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; 4():118. PubMed ID: 26395078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.
    Dundar Y; Dodd S; Dickson R; Walley T; Haycox A; Williamson PR
    Health Technol Assess; 2006 Feb; 10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. PubMed ID: 16487455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.
    Kelly KD; Travers A; Dorgan M; Slater L; Rowe BH
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Nov; 38(5):518-26. PubMed ID: 11679863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol).
    Galipeau J; Moher D; Skidmore B; Campbell C; Hendry P; Cameron DW; Hébert PC; Palepu A
    Syst Rev; 2013 Jun; 2():41. PubMed ID: 23773340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-publication and publication bias in reproductive medicine: a cohort analysis.
    Lensen S; Jordan V; Showell M; Showell E; Shen V; Venetis C; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1658-1666. PubMed ID: 28854591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of search strategies reported in systematic reviews published in stereotactic radiosurgery.
    Faggion CM; Wu YC; Tu YK; Wasiak J
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150878. PubMed ID: 26986458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?
    Lefebvre C; Glanville J; Wieland LS; Coles B; Weightman AL
    Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?
    Aagaard T; Lund H; Juhl C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27875992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Search for unpublished data by systematic reviewers: an audit.
    Ziai H; Zhang R; Chan AW; Persaud N
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017737. PubMed ID: 28988181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review.
    von Elm E; Costanza MC; Walder B; Tramèr MR
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Jul; 3():12. PubMed ID: 12854973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.