211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23714894)
1. Radiographic evaluation of regenerated bone following poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid/hydroxyapatite and deproteinized bovine bone graft in sinus lifting.
Y Baena RR; Lupi SM; Pastorino R; Maiorana C; Lucchese A; Rizzo S
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):845-8. PubMed ID: 23714894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The correlation of bone mineral density and histologic data in the early grafted maxillary sinus: a preliminary report.
Lee CY; Prasad HS; Suzuki JB; Stover JD; Rohrer MD
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):202-14. PubMed ID: 21613947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone regeneration using porous titanium particles versus bovine hydroxyapatite: a sinus lift study in rabbits.
Lambert F; Lecloux G; Léonard A; Sourice S; Layrolle P; Rompen E
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 15(3):412-26. PubMed ID: 21815992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cone Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Alone or in Combination with Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Kiliç SC; Güngörmüş M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):1367-1375. PubMed ID: 27861663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of osteogenic potential between apatite-coated poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite particulates and Bio-Oss.
Kim SS; Kim BS
Dent Mater J; 2008 May; 27(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 18717164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Volumetric Changes of Augmented Maxillary Sinus With Different Bone Grafting Biomaterials.
Gultekin BA; Cansiz E; Borahan O; Mangano C; Kolerman R; Mijiritsky E; Yalcin S
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):e144-8. PubMed ID: 26890457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histological and clinical evaluation of 3 different grafting materials for sinus lifting procedure based on 8 cases.
Karabuda C; Ozdemir O; Tosun T; Anil A; Olgaç V
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1436-42. PubMed ID: 11699487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective analysis of the resorption rate of deproteinized bovine bone as maxillary sinus graft material on cone beam computed tomography.
Umanjec-Korac S; Wu G; Hassan B; Liu Y; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):781-5. PubMed ID: 23594078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of space-filling materials in subantral bone augmentation: blood clot vs. autogenous bone chips vs. bovine hydroxyapatite.
Lambert F; Léonard A; Drion P; Sourice S; Layrolle P; Rompen E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):538-45. PubMed ID: 21198906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized Clinical Trial of Maxillary Sinus Grafting using Deproteinized Porcine and Bovine Bone Mineral.
Lee JS; Shin HK; Yun JH; Cho KS
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):140-150. PubMed ID: 27324175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maxillary Sinus Augmentation With Calcium Phosphate Double-Coated Anorganic Bovine Bone: Comparative Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial With Histological and Radiographic Evaluation.
Pang KM; Lee JK; Choi SH; Kim YK; Kim BJ; Lee JH
Implant Dent; 2019 Feb; 28(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 30570584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Volumetric dimensional changes of autogenous bone and the mixture of hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone graft in humans maxillary sinus augmentation. A multislice tomographic study.
Cosso MG; de Brito RB; Piattelli A; Shibli JA; Zenóbio EG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1251-1256. PubMed ID: 24102867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two Composite Bone Graft Substitutes for Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: Histological, Histomorphometric, and Radiographic Analyses.
Ahmet S; Alper Gultekin B; Karabuda ZC; Olgac V
Implant Dent; 2016 Jun; 25(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 26836126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ridge Preservation After Maxillary Third Molar Extraction Using 30% Porosity PLGA/HA/β-TCP Scaffolds With and Without Simvastatin: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Noronha Oliveira M; Rau LH; Marodin A; Corrêa M; Corrêa LR; Aragones A; Magini RS
Implant Dent; 2017 Dec; 26(6):832-840. PubMed ID: 28885317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical, radiographic, and histological analyses of calcium phosphate cement as filling material in maxillary sinus lift surgery.
Sverzut AT; Rodrigues DC; Lauria A; Armando RS; de Oliveira PT; Moreira RW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jun; 26(6):633-8. PubMed ID: 24502772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using a combination of DFDBA and bovine-derived porous hydroxyapatite: a preliminary histologic and histomorphometric report.
Landi L; Pretel RW; Hakimi NM; Setayesh R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Dec; 20(6):574-83. PubMed ID: 11203594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histomorphometric Evaluation of Two Different Bone Substitutes in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Humans.
Rodriguez y Baena R; Pastorino R; Gherlone EF; Perillo L; Lupi SM; Lucchese A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(1):188-194. PubMed ID: 27912213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new HA/TTCP material for bone augmentation: an in vivo histological pilot study in primates sinus grafting.
Piccinini M; Rebaudi A; Sglavo VM; Bucciotti F; Pierfrancesco R
Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 23296033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histopathological morphometric evaluation of 2 different hydroxyapatite-bone derivatives in sinus augmentation procedures: a comparative study in humans.
Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE; Tal H; Dayan D
J Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 72(7):911-20. PubMed ID: 11495140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental evaluation of the effects of Ankaferd Blood Stopper and collagenated heterologous bone graft on bone healing in sinus floor augmentation.
Cakir M; Karaca İR; Firat A; Kaymaz F; Bozkaya S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 25830387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
