These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23714995)
1. Individual stereolithographic template-guided curved osteotomy for unilateral prominent mandibular angle: a case report. Rong Q; Zhu S; Chen S; Zhang X J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):e289-92. PubMed ID: 23714995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with a stereolithographic template. Chen XY; Chen SL; Zhang X; Li JP; Deng W Ann Plast Surg; 2011 Jan; 66(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 20842002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single stage surgery for contouring the prominent mandibular angle with a broad chin deformity: en-bloc Mandibular Angle-Body-Chin Curved Ostectomy (MABCCO) and Outer Cortex Grinding (OCG). Zhang C; Teng L; Chan FC; Xu JJ; Lu JJ; Xie F; Zhao JY; Xu MB; Jin XL J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1225-33. PubMed ID: 24754914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total mandibular subapical osteotomy and Le Fort I osteotomy using piezosurgery and computer-aided designed and manufactured surgical splints: a favorable combination of three techniques in the management of severe mouth asymmetry in Parry-Romberg syndrome. Scolozzi P; Herzog G J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 May; 72(5):991-9. PubMed ID: 24280170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel method of computer aided orthognathic surgery using individual CAD/CAM templates: a combination of osteotomy and repositioning guides. Li B; Zhang L; Sun H; Yuan J; Shen SG; Wang X Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):e239-44. PubMed ID: 23566536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of two computer-assisted surgery techniques to guide a mandibular distraction osteogenesis procedure. Technical note. d'Hauthuille C; Taha F; Devauchelle B; Testelin S Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 34(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 15695051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel Treatment Planning of Hemimandibular Hyperplasia by the Use of Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided-Design and Computer-Aided-Manufacturing Technologies. Hatamleh MM; Yeung E; Osher J; Huppa C J Craniofac Surg; 2017 May; 28(3):764-767. PubMed ID: 28468161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of stereolithographic cutting guides in corrective (wedge) Lefort I osteotomy. Seeberger R; Scherfler S; Freier K; Thiele O Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 49(5):e20-1. PubMed ID: 20947227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Error analysis of a CAD/CAM method for unidirectional mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Sun H; Li B; Zhao Z; Zhang L; Shen SG; Wang X Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):892-7. PubMed ID: 23583007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques. Yang HJ; Lee WJ; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 20382051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of mandibular genioplasty using a stereolithographic surgical guide: in vitro comparison with a manual measurement method based on preoperative surgical simulation. Kang SH; Lee JW; Lim SH; Kim YH; Kim MK J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):2032-42. PubMed ID: 24780609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional virtual technology in reconstruction of mandibular defect including condyle using double-barrel vascularized fibula flap. Wang WH; Zhu J; Deng JY; Xia B; Xu B J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 41(5):417-22. PubMed ID: 23218981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Orthognathic positioning system: intraoperative system to transfer virtual surgical plan to operating field during orthognathic surgery. Polley JW; Figueroa AA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 71(5):911-20. PubMed ID: 23312847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Xiangdong QI; Limin MA; Shizhen Z J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 40(6):e159-64. PubMed ID: 21907586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical guide for symmetrical aesthetic surgery in unilateral fibrous dysplasia. Kim H; Kim NK; Lim JH; Kim HJ Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 53(7):671-3. PubMed ID: 26043874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of the matching optimal symmetry plane method in planning surgical correction of facial asymmetry--a preliminary report of 20 patients. Wong TY; Liu JK; Fang JJ; Wu TC; Tu YH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1180.e1-13. PubMed ID: 24742699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined use of rapid-prototyping model and surgical guide in correction of mandibular asymmetry malformation patients with normal occlusal relationship. Xu H; Zhang C; Shim YH; Li H; Cao D J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):418-21. PubMed ID: 25759918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Applying computer techniques in repairing mild mandibular asymmetry with high-density porous polyethylene. Wang M; Liu W; Niu F; Qiu S; Liu X; Gui L J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 22337372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Depth deviation and occurrence of early surgical complications or unexpected events using a single stereolithographic surgi-guide. Cassetta M; Stefanelli LV; Giansanti M; Di Mambro A; Calasso S Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 40(12):1377-87. PubMed ID: 22001378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Theoretical considerations for the surgical correction of mandibular deformity in hemifacial microsomia patients using multifocal distraction osteogenesis. Kunz C; Brauchli L; Moehle T; Rahn B; Hammer B J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):364-8. PubMed ID: 12618978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]