320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23715229)
1. Data quality at population-based cancer registries in Colombia.
Cendales R; Pardo C; Uribe C; López G; Yepez MC; Bravo LE
Biomedica; 2012; 32(4):536-44. PubMed ID: 23715229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comprehensive assessment of population-based cancer registries: an experience in Colombia.
Pardo C; Bravo LE; Uribe C; Lopez G; Yepez MC; Navarro E; de Vries E; Pineros M
J Registry Manag; 2014; 41(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 25419606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of death certification in Colombia.
Cendales R; Pardo C
Colomb Med (Cali); 2018 Mar; 49(1):121-127. PubMed ID: 29983472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Colombian death certificate quality, 2002-2006].
Cendales R; Pardo C
Rev Salud Publica (Bogota); 2011 Apr; 13(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 22030881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Data quality at the Icelandic Cancer Registry: comparability, validity, timeliness and completeness.
Sigurdardottir LG; Jonasson JG; Stefansdottir S; Jonsdottir A; Olafsdottir GH; Olafsdottir EJ; Tryggvadottir L
Acta Oncol; 2012 Sep; 51(7):880-9. PubMed ID: 22974093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness.
Parkin DM; Bray F
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):756-64. PubMed ID: 19128954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Epidemiological data sources in Estonia: a survey of registries and databases.
Innos K; Rahu M
J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):293-302. PubMed ID: 11142605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness.
Bray F; Parkin DM
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 19117750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality, comparability and methods of analysis of data on childhood cancer in Europe (1978-1997): report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project.
Steliarova-Foucher E; Kaatsch P; Lacour B; Pompe-Kirn V; Eser S; Miranda A; Danzon A; Ratiu A; Parkin DM
Eur J Cancer; 2006 Sep; 42(13):1915-51. PubMed ID: 16919762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Completeness and timeliness: Cancer registries could/should improve their performance.
Zanetti R; Schmidtmann I; Sacchetto L; Binder-Foucard F; Bordoni A; Coza D; Ferretti S; Galceran J; Gavin A; Larranaga N; Robinson D; Tryggvadottir L; Van Eycken E; Zadnik V; Coebergh JW; Rosso S
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 51(9):1091-8. PubMed ID: 24393522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Index for evaluating completeness of registration in population-based cancer registries and estimation of registration rate at the Osaka Cancer Registry between 1966 and 1992 using this index].
Ajiki W; Tsukuma H; Oshima A
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1998 Oct; 45(10):1011-7. PubMed ID: 9893469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparability of colorectal cancer survival data in three European population-based registries.
Monnet E; Faivre J; Raymond L; Garau I
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1998 Apr; 7(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 9818774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Data quality at the Bulgarian National Cancer Registry: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.
Dimitrova N; Parkin DM
Cancer Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 39(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 25914137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating the cost of operating cancer registries: Experience in Colombia.
de Vries E; Pardo C; Arias N; Bravo LE; Navarro E; Uribe C; Yepez MC; Jurado D; Garci LS; Piñeros M; Edwards P; Beebe MC; Tangka F; Subramanian S
Cancer Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 45 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13-S19. PubMed ID: 27760725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cancer incidence estimates and mortality for the top five cancer in Colombia, 2007-2011.
Pardo C; Cendales R
Colomb Med (Cali); 2018 Mar; 49(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 29983460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A validation of estimating the national cancer incidence in Korea using the databases of 7 population-based regional cancer registries except Seoul].
Community of Population-based Regional Cancer Registries in Korea
J Prev Med Public Health; 2009 Mar; 42(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 19349743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ensuring quality in studies linking cancer registries and biobanks.
Langseth H; Luostarinen T; Bray F; Dillner J
Acta Oncol; 2010 Apr; 49(3):368-77. PubMed ID: 20059313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality evaluation of national cancer registry system in Iran: study protocol.
Modirian M; Rahimzadeh S; Cheraghi Z; Khosravi A; Salimzadeh H; Kompani F; Rezaei N; Qorbani M; Delavari A; Moradi-Lakeh M; Farzadfar F
Arch Iran Med; 2014 Mar; 17(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 24621363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Danish Cancer Registry--history, content, quality and use.
Storm HH; Michelsen EV; Clemmensen IH; Pihl J
Dan Med Bull; 1997 Nov; 44(5):535-9. PubMed ID: 9408738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality and completeness indices.
Tumino R; Ferretti S
Epidemiol Prev; 2004; 28(2 Suppl):17-21. PubMed ID: 15281601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
