BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23715981)

  • 1. Modeling signaling networks with different formalisms: a preview.
    MacNamara A; Henriques D; Saez-Rodriguez J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1021():89-105. PubMed ID: 23715981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors.
    Schoeberl B; Eichler-Jonsson C; Gilles ED; Müller G
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 11923843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A decompositional approach to parameter estimation in pathway modeling: a case study of the Akt and MAPK pathways and their crosstalk.
    Koh G; Teong HF; Clément MV; Hsu D; Thiagarajan PS
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e271-80. PubMed ID: 16873482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A model of TLR4 signaling and tolerance using a qualitative, particle-event-based method: introduction of spatially configured stochastic reaction chambers (SCSRC).
    An G
    Math Biosci; 2009 Jan; 217(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 18950646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structural and dynamical analyses of the kinase network derived from the transpath database.
    Binder B; Heinrich R
    Genome Inform; 2005; 16(1):164-73. PubMed ID: 16362919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visualization and analysis of biological networks.
    Millán PP
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1021():63-88. PubMed ID: 23715980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biological networks 101: computational modeling for molecular biologists.
    Scholma J; Schivo S; Urquidi Camacho RA; van de Pol J; Karperien M; Post JN
    Gene; 2014 Jan; 533(1):379-84. PubMed ID: 24125950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A framework for elucidating regulatory networks based on prior information and expression data.
    Gevaert O; Van Vooren S; De Moor B
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Dec; 1115():240-8. PubMed ID: 17925352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling of cell-to-cell communication processes with Petri nets using the example of quorum sensing.
    Janowski S; Kormeier B; Töpel T; Hippe K; Hofestädt R; Willassen N; Friesen R; Rubert S; Borck D; Haugen P; Chen M
    In Silico Biol; 2010; 10(1):27-48. PubMed ID: 22430220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integration of genomic information with biological networks using Cytoscape.
    Bauer-Mehren A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1021():37-61. PubMed ID: 23715979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling and simulation of biological systems with stochasticity.
    Meng TC; Somani S; Dhar P
    In Silico Biol; 2004; 4(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 15724281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A single gene network accurately predicts phenotypic effects of gene perturbation in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Lee I; Lehner B; Crombie C; Wong W; Fraser AG; Marcotte EM
    Nat Genet; 2008 Feb; 40(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 18223650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benchmarking of dynamic Bayesian networks inferred from stochastic time-series data.
    David LA; Wiggins CH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Dec; 1115():90-101. PubMed ID: 17925346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling and simulation in signal transduction pathways: a systems biology approach.
    Suresh Babu CV; Joo Song E; Yoo YS
    Biochimie; 2006; 88(3-4):277-83. PubMed ID: 16213652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Network modeling of signal transduction: establishing the global view.
    Kestler HA; Wawra C; Kracher B; Kühl M
    Bioessays; 2008 Nov; 30(11-12):1110-25. PubMed ID: 18937364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exhaustive analysis of the modular structure of the spliceosomal assembly network: a Petri net approach.
    Bortfeldt RH; Schuster S; Koch I
    In Silico Biol; 2010; 10(1):89-123. PubMed ID: 22430224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of debacle points for robustness of biological pathways by using recurrent neural networks.
    Kitakaze H; Matsuno H; Ikeda N; Miyano S
    Genome Inform; 2005; 16(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 16362922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Signal detection, modularity, and the correlation between extrinsic and intrinsic noise in biochemical networks.
    Tănase-Nicola S; Warren PB; ten Wolde PR
    Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Aug; 97(6):068102. PubMed ID: 17026206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developing complex signaling models using GENESIS/Kinetikit.
    Vayttaden SJ; Bhalla US
    Sci STKE; 2004 Feb; 2004(219):pl4. PubMed ID: 14872097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inference of signal transduction networks from double causal evidence.
    Albert R; Dasgupta B; Sontag E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 673():239-51. PubMed ID: 20835804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.