These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23716225)

  • 1. A new approach to sound source segregation.
    Lutfi RA; Liu CJ; Stoelinga CN
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():203-11. PubMed ID: 23716225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Binaural Steering Beamformer System for Enhancing a Moving Speech Source.
    Adiloğlu K; Kayser H; Baumgärtel RM; Rennebeck S; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relations Between the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise and Psychophysical Measures of Hearing Measured in Four Languages Using the Auditory Profile Test Battery.
    Van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26647417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of a High Upper Input Limiting Level on Word Recognition in Noise, Sound Quality Preferences, and Subjective Ratings of Real-World Performance.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):547-62. PubMed ID: 26134722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the importance of time-frequency contributions to speech intelligibility in noise.
    Yu C; Wójcicki KK; Loizou PC; Hansen JH; Johnson MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):3007-16. PubMed ID: 24815280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception.
    Warnecke M; Peng ZE; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238125. PubMed ID: 32822439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a transient noise reduction strategy for hearing AIDS.
    Liu H; Zhang H; Bentler RA; Han D; Zhang L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):606-15. PubMed ID: 22967735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1219-30. PubMed ID: 19739735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of presentation level on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' acceptable speech and noise levels.
    Recker KL; Edwards BW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23231813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of spatial separation of speech and noise sources on the optimal setting of the master hearing aid.
    Lawrence DW; Franks JR
    J Am Aud Soc; 1978; 4(2):45-51. PubMed ID: 738914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining perceived sound quality in a simulated hearing aid using the international speech test signal.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Moats P
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):533-5. PubMed ID: 21325947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Target enhancement and noise cancellation in the identification of a rudimentary sound source in noise.
    Lutfi RA; Liu CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):EL52-6. PubMed ID: 21361412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
    Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A measure for predicting audibility discrimination thresholds for spectral envelope distortions in vowel sounds.
    Rao P; van Dinther R; Veldhuis R; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2085-97. PubMed ID: 11386560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectro-temporal weighting of loudness.
    Oberfeld D; Heeren W; Rennies J; Verhey J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50184. PubMed ID: 23209670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal weights in loudness: Investigation of the effects of background noise and sound level.
    Fischenich A; Hots J; Verhey J; Oberfeld D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0223075. PubMed ID: 31689327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychophysics, fitting, and signal processing for combined hearing aid and cochlear implant stimulation.
    Francart T; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):685-700. PubMed ID: 24165299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Segregating two simultaneous sounds in elevation using temporal envelope: Human psychophysics and a physiological model.
    Johnson JS; O'Connor KN; Sutter ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 26233004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Timbre discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners under different noise conditions.
    Emiroglu S; Kollmeier B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():199-207. PubMed ID: 17991457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.