These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23716682)

  • 1. Expert assessments of the cost of light water small modular reactors.
    Abdulla A; Azevedo IL; Morgan MG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Jun; 110(24):9686-91. PubMed ID: 23716682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Expert Elicitation of the Proliferation Resistance of Using Small Modular Reactors (SMR) for the Expansion of Civilian Nuclear Systems.
    Siegel J; Gilmore EA; Gallagher N; Fetter S
    Risk Anal; 2018 Feb; 38(2):242-254. PubMed ID: 28697285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expert judgments about RD&D and the future of nuclear energy.
    Anadón LD; Bosetti V; Bunn M; Catenacci M; Lee A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Nov; 46(21):11497-504. PubMed ID: 23002786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of two methods for expert elicitation in health technology assessments.
    Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():85. PubMed ID: 27456844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying the Effects of Expert Selection and Elicitation Design on Experts' Confidence in Their Judgments About Future Energy Technologies.
    Nemet GF; Anadon LD; Verdolini E
    Risk Anal; 2017 Feb; 37(2):315-330. PubMed ID: 27031439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Group elicitations yield more consistent, yet more uncertain experts in understanding risks to ecosystem services in New Zealand bays.
    Singh GG; Sinner J; Ellis J; Kandlikar M; Halpern BS; Satterfield T; Chan K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182233. PubMed ID: 28767694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health Opportunity Costs: Assessing the Implications of Uncertainty Using Elicitation Methods with Experts.
    Soares MO; Sculpher MJ; Claxton K
    Med Decis Making; 2020 May; 40(4):448-459. PubMed ID: 32441558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy needs versus environmental pollution: a reconciliation?
    Green L
    Science; 1967 Jun; 156(3781):1448-50. PubMed ID: 5611018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nuclear waste from small modular reactors.
    Krall LM; Macfarlane AM; Ewing RC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jun; 119(23):e2111833119. PubMed ID: 35639689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US nuclear power: The vanishing low-carbon wedge.
    Morgan MG; Abdulla A; Ford MJ; Rath M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jul; 115(28):7184-7189. PubMed ID: 29967141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EXPLICIT: a feasibility study of remote expert elicitation in health technology assessment.
    Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Sep; 17(1):131. PubMed ID: 28870196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the Cost, Safety, and Proliferation Risks of Small Floating Nuclear Reactors.
    Ford MJ; Abdulla A; Morgan MG
    Risk Anal; 2017 Nov; 37(11):2191-2211. PubMed ID: 28095598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expert assessments of future photovoltaic technologies.
    Curtright AE; Morgan MG; Keith DW
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Dec; 42(24):9031-8. PubMed ID: 19174867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining experts' judgments: comparison of algorithmic methods using synthetic data.
    Hammitt JK; Zhang Y
    Risk Anal; 2013 Jan; 33(1):109-20. PubMed ID: 22583060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informing Reimbursement Decisions Using Cost-Effectiveness Modelling: A Guide to the Process of Generating Elicited Priors to Capture Model Uncertainties.
    Bojke L; Grigore B; Jankovic D; Peters J; Soares M; Stein K
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Sep; 35(9):867-877. PubMed ID: 28616775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.
    Garside R; Pitt M; Somerville M; Stein K; Price A; Gilbert N
    Health Technol Assess; 2006 Mar; 10(8):1-142, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16545207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy.
    Morgan MG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 May; 111(20):7176-84. PubMed ID: 24821779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing expert elicitation and model-based probabilistic technology cost forecasts for the energy transition.
    Meng J; Way R; Verdolini E; Diaz Anadon L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jul; 118(27):. PubMed ID: 34183405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and economic modelling of minimal incision total hip replacement approaches in the management of arthritic disease of the hip.
    de Verteuil R; Imamura M; Zhu S; Glazener C; Fraser C; Munro N; Hutchison J; Grant A; Coyle D; Coyle K; Vale L
    Health Technol Assess; 2008 Jun; 12(26):iii-iv, ix-223. PubMed ID: 18513467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.